2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.75.174436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncollinear magnetism of Cr and Mn nanoclusters on Ni(111): Changing the magnetic configuration atom by atom

Abstract: The Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker Green-function method for noncollinear magnetic structures was applied on Mn and Cr nanoclusters deposited on the Ni͑111͒ surface. We consider various dimers, trimers, and tetramers. We obtain collinear and noncollinear magnetic solutions, brought about by the competition of antiferromagnetic interactions. It is found that the triangular geometry of the Ni͑111͒ substrate, together with the intracluster antiferromagnetic interactions, is the main cause of the noncollinear states, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
27
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the noncollinear magnetism in Cr clusters might still be possible for more excited isomers having larger bond lengths or in the case of clusters deposited on surfaces. 53 Comparing our results with other GGA calculations, we obtain similar results as previous calculations by Wang et al 23 within Gaussian. In fact, they obtain the same ground-state structure, namely, a triangle with the C s symmetry with two atoms forming an AF dimer at a distance of 1.71 Å and the third atom lying at 2.91 and 2.39 Å to the other two atoms and with a total magnetic moment of 6 B .…”
Section: B Trimerssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Nevertheless, the noncollinear magnetism in Cr clusters might still be possible for more excited isomers having larger bond lengths or in the case of clusters deposited on surfaces. 53 Comparing our results with other GGA calculations, we obtain similar results as previous calculations by Wang et al 23 within Gaussian. In fact, they obtain the same ground-state structure, namely, a triangle with the C s symmetry with two atoms forming an AF dimer at a distance of 1.71 Å and the third atom lying at 2.91 and 2.39 Å to the other two atoms and with a total magnetic moment of 6 B .…”
Section: B Trimerssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Different groups report very different results for the same systems (e.g., Refs. [18,19,20]), so that a preference of one or another result is not obvious. Therefore, not so much the size of cluster is a problem in itself, as the organization of a calculation in a way allowing to extract meaningful results, that is, clearly defining structural and magnetic models and carefully 3 analyzing their consequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8] In the case of nanostructures, for small sizes, recent methodological and technical developments have opened the way to investigate noncollinearity of magnetic nanostructures in the framework of density-functional theory (DFT) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] or within the singleband Hubbard models. 18 However, in the case of large complex low-symmetry nanostructures (e.g., deposited or embedded nanoparticles, alloy clusters, extended surface nanostructures) or properties at finite temperature, the involved numerical effort can be quite significant [19][20][21] or unfeasible at present. Therefore, the development of calculation methods and alternative electronic models remains an important theoretical challenge to complement the progress in this field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%