1973
DOI: 10.1137/0710071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonconforming Elements in the Finite Element Method with Penalty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
127
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
127
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we mainly focus on consistent and stable DG methods. In Section 7 some discussions and numerical results are included for the two non-consistent methods BZ [5] and BMMPR2 [11] (see Tab. 1, third part) which are characterized by a super penalty stabilisation term.…”
Section: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods For the Model Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper we mainly focus on consistent and stable DG methods. In Section 7 some discussions and numerical results are included for the two non-consistent methods BZ [5] and BMMPR2 [11] (see Tab. 1, third part) which are characterized by a super penalty stabilisation term.…”
Section: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods For the Model Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conclude this section, we present a numerical experiment carried out with the super penalty method proposed by Babuška and Zlámal in [5]. This method is not consistent and to ensure stability (in some appropriate norm, see [4] for details) the jumps must be penalised with a power of h depending on the polynomial approximation degree h .…”
Section: Symmetric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This, when ∇P (K) ⊂ Σ(K), can be seen as an extension of the Babuška-Zlámal IP method [3] to second order elliptic problems, when α e is chosen as in (3.2). If instead, α e is chosen as in (3.3), we obtain the penalty formulation proposed in [12].…”
Section: Numerical Fluxes Independent Of σ Hmentioning
confidence: 99%