2008
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.108.129551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncontact Measurement of the Local Mechanical Properties of Living Cells Using Pressure Applied via a Pipette

Abstract: Mechanosensitivity in living biological tissue is a study area of increasing importance, but investigative tools are often inadequate. We have developed a noncontact nanoscale method to apply quantified positive and negative force at defined positions to the soft responsive surface of living cells. The method uses applied hydrostatic pressure (0.1-150 kPa) through a pipette, while the pipette-sample separation is kept constant above the cell surface using ion conductance based distance feedback. This prevents … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first flat slope indicates a low stiffness and is limited to the submembranous cortex of the cell. In agreement with recent force measurements applying an newly developed non-AFM method (33), there is a fluidic layer beneath the plasma membrane, which is highly dynamic in terms of thickness and viscosity. The cortical cytoskeleton of vascular endothelial cells is highly dynamic (34) and the state of polymerization of cortical actin determines the structure and mechanical properties of this layer (21,35).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The first flat slope indicates a low stiffness and is limited to the submembranous cortex of the cell. In agreement with recent force measurements applying an newly developed non-AFM method (33), there is a fluidic layer beneath the plasma membrane, which is highly dynamic in terms of thickness and viscosity. The cortical cytoskeleton of vascular endothelial cells is highly dynamic (34) and the state of polymerization of cortical actin determines the structure and mechanical properties of this layer (21,35).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These approaches are widely used 31,[52][53][54]56 but require an estimate for the nanopipette inner angle, which cannot be obtained directly near the nanopipette opening using SEM, and to date has usually been estimated from the outer pipette angle obtained in SEM images. 55,[57][58][59] Evidently, this approach fails if the assumption about a constant inner angle does not hold.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Existing Methods For Nanopipette Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, optical tweezers might damage cells, [10][11][12] and are not appropriate for detaching adherent, spread cells from surfaces. The latter also holds for glass micropipettes, [13][14][15] the oldest instrument to manipulate single organisms.…”
Section: Force-controlled Spatial Manipulation Of Viable Mammalian Cementioning
confidence: 99%