Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring 2008
DOI: 10.1002/9780470061626.shm041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncontact Rail Monitoring by Ultrasonic Guided Waves

Abstract: Recent train accidents have reaffirmed the need for developing more effective rail defect detection systems than those used today. One of the recent developments in rail inspection is the use of ultrasonic guided waves and noncontact probing techniques to target transverse‐type defects. Besides the obvious advantages of noncontact probing, which include robustness and potential for large inspection speed, such a system can theoretically detect transverse defects under horizontal shelling or head checks. A rail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous non-contact rail inspection system was developed by former students in the NDE&SHM research group of UCSD [15,16,22]. The method was based on hybrid laser transmission and air-coupled detection.…”
Section: Former Ucsd Rail Inspection System Based On a Hybrid Laser/amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previous non-contact rail inspection system was developed by former students in the NDE&SHM research group of UCSD [15,16,22]. The method was based on hybrid laser transmission and air-coupled detection.…”
Section: Former Ucsd Rail Inspection System Based On a Hybrid Laser/amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawbacks of this technique include a low efficiency and the needing for large magnets to be sufficiently effective. Another non-contact rail inspection technique was developed at the University of California at San Diego (UCSD) [15,16] and, in parallel, at the Transportation Technology Center (TTC) [17], and it is based on a hybrid laser transmission and air-coupled detection. The UCSD system features a statistical analysis of the data collected by the receivers that increases the defect detectability and minimizes false positives [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting received signals present a rather low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), thus the need of specialized filtering to reduce the noise level. A statistical pattern recognition algorithm (multivariate outlier analysis of the type used in the previous hybrid system 13,14,16 ) is then applied to the filtered signals in order to provide a reliable indication of defects and minimize false positives. This algorithm is of the unsupervised type, hence it does not require any learning cycle on known defects.…”
Section: Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12] Drawbacks of this technique include a low efficiency and the need for large magnets to be sufficiently effective. Another noncontact rail inspection technique was developed at the University of California at San Diego (UCSD) 13,14 and, in parallel, at the Transportation Technology Center, 15 and it is based on a hybrid laser transmission and air-coupled detection. The UCSD system features a statistical analysis of the data collected by the receivers that increases the defect detectability and minimizes false positives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Ultrasonic guided wave techniques have been considered for at least 20 years for rail inspections, and specifically for the detection of transverse defects. 37–53 The global–local technique presented in this article constitutes an ideal tool for this application, given the multitude of guided wave modes propagating in a rail and the complex geometry of the rail waveguide. The wave regime that is considered includes high frequencies (up to 180 kHz) that have never been examined by global–local wave studies in rails.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%