2017
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonconventional Therapeutic Protocol for Type III Dens Invaginatus

Abstract: Introduction This study discusses a nonconventional therapeutic protocol for type III dens invaginatus. This condition is a disorder of dental development, caused by the invagination of enamel into coronal and/or radicular dentin structure. This promotes several structural alterations within the dental organ, which offers challenges and difficulties to perform the endodontic treatment when needed. This article reports a clinical case where a conservative approach was adopted to preserve the invaginated tooth, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maintenance of pulp vitality of the main canal is possible once the invagination presents no connection with the root canal system ( de Sousa & Bramante, 1998). When one of the canals is vital but there is contact between the two canals, a pulpotomy ( Kunert et al , 2017) or pulpectomy in the vital canal can be performed. In the literature, intervention in the main canal may not be necessary, especially in cases where the main canal has vital pulp or when there is no anatomical communication with the invaginated canal ( Gonçalves et al , 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maintenance of pulp vitality of the main canal is possible once the invagination presents no connection with the root canal system ( de Sousa & Bramante, 1998). When one of the canals is vital but there is contact between the two canals, a pulpotomy ( Kunert et al , 2017) or pulpectomy in the vital canal can be performed. In the literature, intervention in the main canal may not be necessary, especially in cases where the main canal has vital pulp or when there is no anatomical communication with the invaginated canal ( Gonçalves et al , 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%