2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonconvex regularizer and latent pattern based robust regression for face recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the previous work, there are some observations: (1) Anchor-based face detectors [23,7,17,24,25] have demonstrated the most promising accuracy, particularly on the most challenging dataset Wider Face [26]. (2) Almost all the state-of-the-art(SOTA) anchor-based face detectors adopt multi-scale detection heads and deploy many facial specific modules for dense anchor design [9] and anchor mining [8,23,24], which may lead to anchor misalignment and poor design generality easily. (3) Although heatmap-based anchor-free detectors can achieve SOTA results on the generic object detection [27,28,29], yet most heatmap-based face detectors [30,15] suffer from low face detection accuracy [13].…”
Section: : How To Improve the Accuracy Of Heatmap-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the previous work, there are some observations: (1) Anchor-based face detectors [23,7,17,24,25] have demonstrated the most promising accuracy, particularly on the most challenging dataset Wider Face [26]. (2) Almost all the state-of-the-art(SOTA) anchor-based face detectors adopt multi-scale detection heads and deploy many facial specific modules for dense anchor design [9] and anchor mining [8,23,24], which may lead to anchor misalignment and poor design generality easily. (3) Although heatmap-based anchor-free detectors can achieve SOTA results on the generic object detection [27,28,29], yet most heatmap-based face detectors [30,15] suffer from low face detection accuracy [13].…”
Section: : How To Improve the Accuracy Of Heatmap-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We set Gaussian radius with the overlaps of predicted bounding box and the ground-truth adaptively instead of same standard deviation. Face classification loss L center is calculated by the focal loss [29] as in equation (2).…”
Section: Multi-task Face and Landmark Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation