2017
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201700252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncovalent Interactions between Dopamine and Regular and Defective Graphene

Abstract: The role of noncovalent interactions in the adsorption of biological molecules on graphene is a subject of fundamental interest regarding the use of graphene as a material for sensing and drug delivery. The adsorption of dopamine on regular graphene and graphene with monovacancies (GV) is theoretically studied within the framework of density functional theory. Several adsorption modes are considered, and notably those in which the dopamine molecule is oriented parallel or quasi-parallel to the surface are the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the values summarized in Table , we can observe that the first contribution is in the range of −1.206 eV to −1.478 eV, while the second contribution is in the range of +0.071 eV to −2.678 eV, for the three values of applied electric field; i. e., the latter exhibits a much broader variability, according to the strength of molecule‐substrate bonding. E GGA always makes a stabilizing contribution in almost all cases, as was obtained for ZDA/Ag; however, for NDA/Ag(111), with E =0 V/Å, it is destabilizing, similarly as it was obtained previously for DA/graphene . The E GGA contribution to E ads is prevailing for PDA/Ag(111) (more than 60%) and minority for NDA/Ag(111) (less than 15%), while it is intermediate for DPDA/Ag(111) and ZDA/Ag(111).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…From the values summarized in Table , we can observe that the first contribution is in the range of −1.206 eV to −1.478 eV, while the second contribution is in the range of +0.071 eV to −2.678 eV, for the three values of applied electric field; i. e., the latter exhibits a much broader variability, according to the strength of molecule‐substrate bonding. E GGA always makes a stabilizing contribution in almost all cases, as was obtained for ZDA/Ag; however, for NDA/Ag(111), with E =0 V/Å, it is destabilizing, similarly as it was obtained previously for DA/graphene . The E GGA contribution to E ads is prevailing for PDA/Ag(111) (more than 60%) and minority for NDA/Ag(111) (less than 15%), while it is intermediate for DPDA/Ag(111) and ZDA/Ag(111).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Therefore, the electronic contribution is repulsive and NDA to Ag binding is mainly due to attractive dispersive interactions. This remark was outlined before for NDA adsorption on graphene [53] and for adenine on graphene, [54] which was attributed to the fact that at adsorbate-substrate distances less than 3 Å, the kinetic energy contribution to the energy of single-particle Kohn-Sham orbitals is more relevant than the attractive contribution due to electronic exchange and correlation effects. Conversely, the presence of attractive interactions in the non-vdW contribution cannot be discarded for the NDA/Ag system, as it was explained for the case of adenine adsorption on Cu(110), where the binding was attributed to an ionic interaction between adsorbate and substrate.…”
Section: The Free Neutral Dopamine and Zwitterionic Dopamine Speciesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…level (see details in SI) using the model graphene structures presented in Figure 7. While graphene and N-graphene with vacancies have been studied theoretically, [22][23] to our knowledge this is the first time that DFT calculations have been used to evaluate the interaction of DA with graphitic edges, and the first to take into account the entropic contributions to the adsorption by computing the Gibbs free energy of adsorption, G ads. We started our computational analysis by optimising the structures of the isolated DA molecule and the graphitic model surfaces shown in Figure 7, followed by the adsorption of DA on the different surfaces taking into account all the possible orientations and adsorption sites.…”
Section: Computational Studies Of Da Adsorption On Graphene Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20] Recently, catechol has been shown to adsorb on graphene nanoplatelets 21 and the adsorption of DA on graphene, in particular, has been investigated by means of theoretical calculations. [22][23] Due to its biological relevance as an important neurotransmitter, DA has also been intensely studied in the context of electroanalysis and simultaneous detection in the presence of co-analytes such as ascorbic acid. [24][25][26] DA also has relevance to the nitrogenated amorphous carbon literature in this context, [26][27][28] because these carbons may be engineered to have low background currents and wide potential windows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%