Noncrop features and heterogeneity mediate overwintering bird diversity in agricultural landscapes of southwest China

Abstract

Farmland birds are of conservation concerns around the world. In China, conservation management has focused primarily on natural habitats, whereas little attention has been given to agricultural landscapes. Although agricultural land use is intensive in China, environmental heterogeneity can be highly variable in some regions due to variations in crop and noncrop elements within a landscape. We examined how noncrop heterogeneity, crop heterogeneity, and noncrop features (noncrop vegetation and water body such as open water) influenced species richness and abundance of all birds as well as three functional groups (woodland species, agricultural land species, and agricultural wetland species) in the paddy‐dominated landscapes of Erhai water basin situated in northwest Yunnan, China. Birds, crop, and noncrop vegetation surveys in twenty 1 km × 1 km landscape plots were conducted during the winter season (from 2014 to 2015). The results revealed that bird community compositions were best explained by amounts of noncrop vegetation and compositional heterogeneity of noncrop habitat (Shannon–Wiener index). Both variables also had a positive effect on richness and abundance of woodland species. Richness of agricultural wetland species increased with increasing areas of water bodies within the landscape plot. Richness of total species was also greater in the landscapes characterized by larger areas of water bodies, high proportion of noncrop vegetation, high compositional heterogeneity of noncrop habitat, or small field patches (high crop configurational heterogeneity). Crop compositional heterogeneity did not show significant effects neither on the whole community (all birds) nor on any of the three functional groups considered. These findings suggest that total bird diversity and some functional groups, especially woodland species, would benefit from increases in the proportion of noncrop features such as woody vegetation and water bodies as well as compositional heterogeneity of noncrop features within landscape.

Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: A global review and meta‐analysis

“…Previous studies have rarely compared the effects of crop and landscape heterogeneity or their compositional and configurational components on biodiversity (Batáry et al., 2020). We hypothesized that highly mobile large‐bodied taxa, such as birds and other vertebrates, are able to use both crop and non‐crop resources at large spatial scales (Li et al., 2020; Martínez‐Núñez et al., 2023; Monck‐Whipp et al., 2018; Pustkowiak et al., 2021; Redlich et al., 2018). We predicted they would benefit from landscape heterogeneity more than crop heterogeneity (Figure 1c).…”