2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2923584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondata-Aided Error Vector Magnitude Analysis of $\eta-\mu$ Fading Channels in Device-to-Device Communications

Abstract: Transmission in non-line-of-sight (NLOS) conditions has a poor throughput in device-to-device (D2D) communications. In order to achieve high throughput, adaptive modulation has been selected as a spectrally-efficient transmission technology. Moreover, quantifying the performance of a fading channel in NLOS conditions becomes a core issue. In general, the η − µ distribution can be employed to characterize and model the NLOS fading channel. Effective evaluating the quality of η − µ channels can provide an effici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rayleigh distribution [6] 3 Rician distribution 2 [7] 4 Nakagami-m distribution 2 [8] 5 Hoyt (Nakagami-q) distribution [9] 6 k-µ distribution 1, 2, 3, 4 [10] 7 k-µ shadowed fading 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 [4] In recent years, there have been many studies on channel performance analysis and system performance optimization of typical fading channel models both domestically and internationally, as reported in [1,[11][12][13]. However, there have been relatively few studies on parameter estimation of the k-µ distribution and k-µ shadowing distribution models [14][15][16][17]. In [14], the authors analyzed the error vector magnitude (EVM) performance of the k-µ fading channel, where the EVM parameter was used to evaluate the variation of channel quality, and the results could be used to predict the lower bound of channel quality based on k-µ fading channels.…”
Section: Model Number Model Type Degradation To Other Models Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rayleigh distribution [6] 3 Rician distribution 2 [7] 4 Nakagami-m distribution 2 [8] 5 Hoyt (Nakagami-q) distribution [9] 6 k-µ distribution 1, 2, 3, 4 [10] 7 k-µ shadowed fading 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 [4] In recent years, there have been many studies on channel performance analysis and system performance optimization of typical fading channel models both domestically and internationally, as reported in [1,[11][12][13]. However, there have been relatively few studies on parameter estimation of the k-µ distribution and k-µ shadowing distribution models [14][15][16][17]. In [14], the authors analyzed the error vector magnitude (EVM) performance of the k-µ fading channel, where the EVM parameter was used to evaluate the variation of channel quality, and the results could be used to predict the lower bound of channel quality based on k-µ fading channels.…”
Section: Model Number Model Type Degradation To Other Models Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there have been relatively few studies on parameter estimation of the k-µ distribution and k-µ shadowing distribution models [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. In [ 14 ], the authors analyzed the error vector magnitude (EVM) performance of the k-µ fading channel, where the EVM parameter was used to evaluate the variation of channel quality, and the results could be used to predict the lower bound of channel quality based on k-µ fading channels. In [ 15 ], the authors assumed QAM modulation channels passing through k-µ shadow fading channels and proposed the average symbol error rate (ASER) expressions for orthogonal amplitude modulation (RQAM) and cross-orthogonal amplitude modulation (XQAM) in single-input single-output (SISO) and multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the number of subcarriers is large, the real and imaginary parts of x p and x c can be assumed to be independent and identically distributed Gaussian random variables with zero mean and variance of σ 2 xp and σ 2 xc , respectively [13]. Then, the conditional probability density function of the received QAM signal is given by:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…performance evaluation measured by error vector magnitude (EVM), is crucial for achieving reliable data transmission [3,4]. EVM is an indicator of signal error statistics for higherorder MFs, which can be connected to bit error rate (BER) [5] and overall signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) [6,7] within a limited range of actual defects. Tracking EVM has the ability to expand the functional capabilities of network modules by supplying network analytics functions with understandable error information about the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%