1997
DOI: 10.1080/15324989709381490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive assessment of rangeland soil depth to petrocalcic horizon using electromagnetic induction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Khakural et al (1998) found that A-horizon thickness was best estimated by measurements of EM H . Boettinger et al (1997), who used measurements of EC a to estimate soil depth to a cemented (petrocalcic) subsoil horizon, also concluded that measurements made with horizontal dipole orientation of the EM38 (EM H ) was the best mode. In the present research, there was no indication of better correlation between subsoil properties and EM V (Table 2), in spite of the larger relative weighting of the EM V signal from the subsoil compared to that of EM H .…”
Section: Differences Between Em H and Em Vmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Khakural et al (1998) found that A-horizon thickness was best estimated by measurements of EM H . Boettinger et al (1997), who used measurements of EC a to estimate soil depth to a cemented (petrocalcic) subsoil horizon, also concluded that measurements made with horizontal dipole orientation of the EM38 (EM H ) was the best mode. In the present research, there was no indication of better correlation between subsoil properties and EM V (Table 2), in spite of the larger relative weighting of the EM V signal from the subsoil compared to that of EM H .…”
Section: Differences Between Em H and Em Vmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In other words, the land upon which the plots occur is very old. This is shown by the continuous accumulation of the petrocalic layer (Boettinger et al 1997) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several field-scale and landscape-scale special soil research projects, EMI has been used to map small areas and assess the depths to argillic horizons, claypans, fragipans, hardpans, and petrocalcic horizons (Boettinger et al, 1997;Chen et al, 2000;Doolittle et al, 1994;Mueller et al, 2003;Saey et al, 2012a;Stroh et al, 1993;Sudduth and Kitchen, 1993;Sudduth et al, 1995Sudduth et al, , 2009, reconstruct buried landscapes (De Smedt et al, 2013a, 2013bSaey et al, 2008Saey et al, , 2013 and periglacial features (Meerschman et al, 2011a, Saey et al, 2012a; estimate depths to bedrock (Bork et al, 1998;Doolittle et al, 1998Doolittle et al, , 2002bPalacky and Stephens, 1990;Zalasiewicz et al, 1985), and assess differences in soil drainage (Kravchenko et al, 2002).…”
Section: Refine and Improve The Quality Of Soil Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%