2011
DOI: 10.12953/2177-6830.v02n01a01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive Evaluation of a Tropical Hardwood: Interrelationship Between Methods and Physical-Acoustical Variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the values obtained through stress wave method were higher than static values. Several studies have reported that values of dynamic modulus of elasticity are often higher than those obtained using static bending tests (Teles et al 2011;Passialis and Adamopoulos 2002;Barrett et al 2008). The lower static MOE values were expected because static measurement includes shear deflection, whereas MTG results are essentially shear free MOE values (Barrett et al 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the values obtained through stress wave method were higher than static values. Several studies have reported that values of dynamic modulus of elasticity are often higher than those obtained using static bending tests (Teles et al 2011;Passialis and Adamopoulos 2002;Barrett et al 2008). The lower static MOE values were expected because static measurement includes shear deflection, whereas MTG results are essentially shear free MOE values (Barrett et al 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divos and Tanaka (2005) reported that R 2 values between static and dynamic MOE values can be between 0.9 and 0.96, and dynamic MOE values are usually 10% higher than the static MOE values. Biechele et al (2010) have reached the coefficient of determination values of 0.80 and 0.97 for spruce timber using stress wave and transverse vibration methods, respectively, while Teles et al (2011) have reported the coefficient of determination values of 0.84 and 0.94 for tropical hardwood species using same methods. Ravenshorst and van de Kuilen (2006) evaluated bending properties of 30 different hardwood species using both destructive and nondestructive testing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of correlation is dependent on the species and the method used (Karlinasari et al 2008, Ravenshorst et al 2008, Teles et al 2011.…”
Section: Universidad Del Bío -Bíomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods apply a close correlation between the dynamic and the static modulus of elasticity values which was proved for sound wood in different states such as timber (Hassan et al 2013), logs (Zhou et al 2013) or Laminated Veneer Lumber (Wang et al 2003) and decayed wood as well . Few studies deal with different tropical species such as Sextonia rubra for which nondestructive methods were used for predicting the stiffness of lumber with very high accuracy (r = 0,91 for stress wave method) (Teles et al 2011). Karlinasari et al (2008) showed a strong relation between the static and the ultrasound dynamic moduli of elasticity for small clear specimens of four tropical hardwoods (r=0,82), on the other hand, lower values were found when species were evaluated individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a contradiction in the literature on whether SV is correlated with wood density or not. Some authors (Oliveira et al 2002;Ilic 2003;Teles et al 2011) determined that there is no relationship between density and velocity, while others (Oliveira and Sales 2006;Baradit and Niemz 2012) reported a positive relationship between density and velocity. Some authors (Ilic 2003;Krauss and Kúdela 2011) claim that velocity is related to the micro-fibrillar angle, while Gerhards (1982b) and Beall (2002) pointed out that grain angle has a major impact on the SV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%