Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2848-7_290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive Evaluation of Hardwood Logs Using Automated Interpretation of CT Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the segmentation algorithms do not work properly for young trees for which heartwood has a too small area (Nordmark 2002). In other studies, moisture content variation within the green log was identified as a source of error in distinguishing defects from sound wood because the difference in CT numbers is attributed to the difference in moisture content rather than to that in density (Taylor et al 1984;Funt and Bryant 1987;Schmoldt et al 1993;Schad et al 1996;Müller and Teischinger 2001;Bucur 2003a;Middleton et al 2003;Alkan et al 2007;Longuetaud et al 2007;Brüchert et al 2008). The algorithms that labeled the identified regions based on a supposed elliptical shape of knots did not work very well for identifying knots with irregular shapes on CT slices (Bhandarkar et al 1999).…”
Section: Knotsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the segmentation algorithms do not work properly for young trees for which heartwood has a too small area (Nordmark 2002). In other studies, moisture content variation within the green log was identified as a source of error in distinguishing defects from sound wood because the difference in CT numbers is attributed to the difference in moisture content rather than to that in density (Taylor et al 1984;Funt and Bryant 1987;Schmoldt et al 1993;Schad et al 1996;Müller and Teischinger 2001;Bucur 2003a;Middleton et al 2003;Alkan et al 2007;Longuetaud et al 2007;Brüchert et al 2008). The algorithms that labeled the identified regions based on a supposed elliptical shape of knots did not work very well for identifying knots with irregular shapes on CT slices (Bhandarkar et al 1999).…”
Section: Knotsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to Hodges et al (1990), investments in CT scanning systems could be profitable with increases in lumber value yield of 5%-10% in the case of large hardwood sawmills (60-103 m 3 ·year -1 ) and of 30% in the case of smaller hardwood sawmills (12-103 m 3 ·year -1 ). However, it was suggested that the use of CT scanners is only economically sound for high-value logs (Schmoldt et al 1993;Rinnhofer et al 2003;Harding et al 2007) and only on defect areas of logs (Schmoldt et al 1993). …”
Section: Operability Of X-ray Ct Scanners In Real Wood Industry Envirmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations