2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-021-00754-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Femur Bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14] Moreover, the results showed that reducing the size of the unit cell of the scaffold maintains the constant porosity, slightly changes the mechanical strength, and significantly increases the surface-to-volume ratio. Before comparing these geometries, the following factors should be taken into account for the trabecular bone of the cortical and spongy parts of the femur: 1) Based on the reviewed sources, [26][27][28] the Young's modulus for the cortical part of the bone is 18.54 GPa and for the trabecular part of the bone is 3.6 GPa. 2) Considering the reviewed sources, [3,15,29] the desired value for the pore size to allow for effective cell infiltration is considered to be 0.6 mm.…”
Section: Determining the Appropriate Geometry For Cortical And Trabec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] Moreover, the results showed that reducing the size of the unit cell of the scaffold maintains the constant porosity, slightly changes the mechanical strength, and significantly increases the surface-to-volume ratio. Before comparing these geometries, the following factors should be taken into account for the trabecular bone of the cortical and spongy parts of the femur: 1) Based on the reviewed sources, [26][27][28] the Young's modulus for the cortical part of the bone is 18.54 GPa and for the trabecular part of the bone is 3.6 GPa. 2) Considering the reviewed sources, [3,15,29] the desired value for the pore size to allow for effective cell infiltration is considered to be 0.6 mm.…”
Section: Determining the Appropriate Geometry For Cortical And Trabec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For TPBA, the supports were located at the distal and proximal ends. Here the axes are constrained vertically downward alone [15,[21][22][23].…”
Section: Fe Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent experiments, computer aided design and CT scanning have been used to represent geometries. Furthermore, the appropriate material properties of human bones have been considered [4][5][6]23]. The fracture load of bones has been accurately predicted using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) based FE models under diverse loading circumstances [7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellular and foam structures are ubiquitous in nature. Examples range from honeycombs, 1 bone interiors, 2 insect wings, 3 to foam bubbles, 4 all of which exhibit a wide range of material properties and functionalities that cannot be realized with traditional engineering configurations. Developing mechanistic understanding and numerical optimization of cellular structures with complex geometric patterns have received extensive attention in both scientific and engineering communities 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%