2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.106.133002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive Fluorescent State Detection of Single Neutral Atom Qubits

Abstract: We demonstrate nondestructive (lossless) fluorescent state detection of individual neutral atom qubits trapped in an optical lattice. The hyperfine state of the atom is measured with a 95% accuracy and an atom loss rate of 1%. Individual atoms are initialized and detected over 100 times before being lost from the trap, representing a 100-fold improvement in data collection rates over previous experiments. Microwave Rabi oscillations are observed with repeated measurements of one and the same single atom.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, addressing individual atoms in optical lattices is difficult because the separation between neighboring lattice sites is comparable to the best achievable focusing widths of laser beams (both typically being 0.5-0.8 µm), but recent progress suggests that there may be methods for overcoming this difficulty (Bakr et al, 2009(Bakr et al, , 2010Fuhrmanek et al, 2011;Gibbons et al, 2011;Nelson et al, 2007;Sherson et al, 2010;Weitenberg et al, 2011;Würtz et al, 2009).…”
Section: A Atoms and Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, addressing individual atoms in optical lattices is difficult because the separation between neighboring lattice sites is comparable to the best achievable focusing widths of laser beams (both typically being 0.5-0.8 µm), but recent progress suggests that there may be methods for overcoming this difficulty (Bakr et al, 2009(Bakr et al, , 2010Fuhrmanek et al, 2011;Gibbons et al, 2011;Nelson et al, 2007;Sherson et al, 2010;Weitenberg et al, 2011;Würtz et al, 2009).…”
Section: A Atoms and Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 has been compiled from the region-of-interest binning of the EMCCD counts in state detection image for 1.5×10 4 well-resolved atoms that have been prepared in the bright and dark state, respectively. The optimal threshold for state discrimination T opt is found as the threshold value that minimizes the mean value of the state detection error [7,11,29] …”
Section: B State Detection By Threshold Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The associated population of excited states causes optically-trapped atoms to experience a dipole force frequently opposing the confinement action of the optical lattice. In practice, the cooling schemes are not limited by this effect and it is commonly assumed that the anti-confining potentials are not relevant for the motional dynamics of the atoms during near-resonant illumination [7]. In consequence, their heating contribution has not received adequate theoretical attention [15] since the early days of laser cooling [16,17] and only recently it has been considered to improve Raman cooling in an optical lattice [18].…”
Section: Heating Dynamics Of Optically Trapped Atoms Under Near-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the other Bell states are off resonant and energetically inaccessible, the double occupancy never occurs for such states. A further florescent picture of the system, which can be done without disturbing the internal states [27], will determine the number of atoms in the first site and reveals if the two atoms are in a singlet state or not. A backward adiabatic evolution (i.e.…”
Section: Application For Optical Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%