2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.62.125020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonequilibrium quantum dynamics of second order phase transitions

Abstract: We use the so-called Liouville-von Neumann (LvN) approach to study the nonequilibrium quantum dynamics of time-dependent second order phase transitions. The LvN approach is a canonical method that unifies the functional Schrödinger equation for the quantum evolution of pure states and the LvN equation for the quantum description of mixed states of either equilibrium or nonequilibrium. As nonequilibrium quantum mechanical systems we study a time-dependent harmonic and an anharmonic oscillator and find the exact… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantization of the closed universe is more intriguing than the open or flat universe since the frequency for each oscillator changes the sign after e α 0 = √ p and thus becomes unstable. The inverted quantum oscillators occur in the slow-rolling inflation model [42] and in the second order phase transition [43]. Now the solutions for sub-Planckian size universes are…”
Section: Closed Universementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantization of the closed universe is more intriguing than the open or flat universe since the frequency for each oscillator changes the sign after e α 0 = √ p and thus becomes unstable. The inverted quantum oscillators occur in the slow-rolling inflation model [42] and in the second order phase transition [43]. Now the solutions for sub-Planckian size universes are…”
Section: Closed Universementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of time-dependent electric fields, the Hamiltonian (8) is a system of decoupled, time-dependent oscillators, for which we may use a pair of invariants for each oscillator as the time-dependent annihilation and the creation operators, and construct the Fock space of number states [14][15][16][17][18]. From Eq.…”
Section: Invariant Operators In Time-dependent Electric Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been known that an oscillator with time-dependent frequency and/or mass has a quantum invariant, known as the Lewis-Riesenfeld invariant, whose eigenstate provides an exact solution of the Schrödinger equation up to a time-dependent phase factor [13]. Hence, in the former case of electric fields, we may employ the time-dependent annihilation and the creation operators, also quantum invariants, and construct not only excited states for each time-dependent oscillator [14][15][16] but also a thermal state [17,18]. In the second case of magnetic fields, however, the Hamiltonian for the functional Schrödinger equation is equivalent to coupled, time-dependent oscillators, and hence, we should employ the invariants for coupled, time-dependent oscillators [19][20][21][22].The quantum invariant method for time-dependent oscillators is very useful in constructing various quantum states from the vacuum state, ranging from excited states to coherent states and even to thermal states (for review and references, see Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system whose Hamiltonian explicitly depends on time has attracted considerable attention (Bandyopadhyay et al, 2001;Choi, 2004a;Dodonov and Man'ko, 1978;Kim and Lee, 2000;Nieto and Truax, 2000;Pedrosa and Guedes, 2002;Samaj, 2002;Song, 2000;Um et al, 2002;Wei et al, 2002) for several decades because of its applications to various branches in physics. The dynamical invariant operator method has been widely employed to find exact quantum states of TDHS after the report of simple relation between the solutions of the Schrödinger equation and the eigenstates of dynamical invariants for the timedependent harmonic oscillator by Lewis and Riesenfeld (1969).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%