2017
DOI: 10.1159/000479885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonfunctional Redundant Acts Characterize OCD, Even in OCD-Unrelated Tasks: A Demonstration in Questionnaire Completion

Abstract: Background: Ethological methods used to analyze human obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) rituals demonstrated excess of unnecessary repetitions as well as irrelevant, idiosyncratic acts (additions) compared to normal activity. A question that still remains is whether these well-known repetitions and additions are manifested in behaviors unrelated to the OCD rituals. Our objectives were to: (1) assess whether OCD-related repetitions and additions as found in previous studies also affect the patients' activity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Zor and colleagues, for each participant (OCD patients and matched controls), we divided the acts into "functional" (FA), compulsory for task performance, and "nonfunctional" (NFA), unnecessary or even irrelevant for that task. 12,28 According to such a definition, we chose to label as FA also some kinds of acts that are functional in themselves (eg, regarding the action of washing hands: "rubbing between the fingers" or "rubbing thumb") but so specific that they were generally not performed by healthy controls.…”
Section: Functional and Nonfunctional Actsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following Zor and colleagues, for each participant (OCD patients and matched controls), we divided the acts into "functional" (FA), compulsory for task performance, and "nonfunctional" (NFA), unnecessary or even irrelevant for that task. 12,28 According to such a definition, we chose to label as FA also some kinds of acts that are functional in themselves (eg, regarding the action of washing hands: "rubbing between the fingers" or "rubbing thumb") but so specific that they were generally not performed by healthy controls.…”
Section: Functional and Nonfunctional Actsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elementary action units were then categorized into functional/common acts (i.e., necessary for task completion) and nonfunctional ones (unnecessary or even irrelevant for the task). 11,12,27,28 Using this approach, it was possible to lump together and assess statistically different kinds of ritual behaviors in humans 11,12 and to investigate their formal features compared with the corresponding physiological behaviors. 27 In this regard, compared with normal performance of the same motor tasks, OCD rituals were longer in duration, comprised a greater repertoire of unnecessary acts and significantly more repetitions of both superfluous and common acts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Zor and colleagues, acts considered essential to the performance of the task were classified as “functional” (FA); acts considered as being not compulsory for the task were classified as “nonfunctional” (NFA) (Amitai et al, 2017; Zor, Keren, et al, 2009). According to such a definition, we chose to label as FA also some kinds of acts that are functional in themselves (e.g., regarding the action of washing hands: “rubbing between the fingers” or “rubbing thumb”) but so specific that they were generally not performed by healthy controls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model does not yet include other characteristics of OCD, such as additional nonfunctional ritual behaviors (Amitai et al, 2017;Eilam, Zor, Fineberg, & Hermesh, 2012) or indecision aspects (Sachdev & Malhi, 2005) that can occur in OCD and TTM. At its present level of development, our model lacks some key mechanisms hypothesized to be behind such nonfunctional ritual behaviors.…”
Section: Face Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%