2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.96.053105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonhelical turbulence and the inverse transfer of energy: A parameter study

Abstract: We explore the phenomenon of the recently discovered inverse transfer of energy from small to large scales in decaying magnetohydrodynamical turbulence by Brandenburg et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 075001 (2015)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.114.075001], even for nonhelical magnetic fields. For this investigation we mainly employ the Pencil Code performing a parameter study, where we vary the Prandtl number, the kinematic viscosity, and the initial spectrum. We find that to get a decay that exhibits this in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, actual equipartition, which one could expect, is not reached and could be related to the fields' intermittent nature over the total volume (Subramanian 1998; Federrath et al 2011). This is also similar to the departure from full equipartition observed in earlier simulations of turbulence with the Pencil-Code (e.g., Reppin & Banerjee 2017).…”
Section: Evolution Of Magnetic and Kinetic Amplitudesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, actual equipartition, which one could expect, is not reached and could be related to the fields' intermittent nature over the total volume (Subramanian 1998; Federrath et al 2011). This is also similar to the departure from full equipartition observed in earlier simulations of turbulence with the Pencil-Code (e.g., Reppin & Banerjee 2017).…”
Section: Evolution Of Magnetic and Kinetic Amplitudesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Another problem which may be intimately connected to the flux-tube dynamics is that of the recently reported numerical observation of inverse transfer of magnetic energy in non-helical turbulent systems (Zrake 2014;Brandenburg, Kahniashvili & Tevzadze 2015;Reppin & Banerjee 2017). These results have been met with some surprise, because conventionally in MHD turbulence, the inverse energy transfer associated with the inverse cascade of magnetic helicity is explained by the conservation of non-zero net magnetic helicity (Pouquet 1978;Matthaeus & Lamkin 1986;Christensson, Hindmarsh & Brandenburg 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here n B and n λ are positive constants, which are determined by the helicity of the magnetic fields and properties of the turbulence [55,56]. Supposing that (i) the equilibration of the magnetic fields and velocity fields 3 and (ii) the coherence length is determined by the eddy scale of the turbulence, λ c ∼ vt ∝ B c t, we have n B ¼ 1 − n λ , which is also seen in the MHD simulations.…”
Section: B Second Stage: V ≠mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…At that stage, the standard MHD studies (without dark magnetic fields) have shown that the magnetic fields evolve according to a scaling law that depends on whether there is an inverse cascade [48][49][50][51], direct cascade [41,48,49,52], or inverse transfer [53][54][55][56]. In any case, as a first approximation, the magnetic fields are described by the comoving field strength B…”
Section: B Second Stage: V ≠mentioning
confidence: 99%