2003
DOI: 10.1128/iai.71.3.1574-1579.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonhuman Primate Model for Listeria monocytogenes -Induced Stillbirths

Abstract: Listeria monocytogenes, isolated from outbreaks in either human or nonhuman primate populations, was administered orally at doses ranging from 10 6 to 10 10 CFU. Four of 10 treated animals delivered stillborn infants. L. monocytogenes was isolated from fetal tissue, and the pathology was consistent with L. monocytogenes infection as the cause of pregnancy loss. For all pregnancies resulting in stillbirths, L. monocytogenes was isolated from maternal feces, indicating that L. monocytogenes had survived and had … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…immunization because we required a more precise delivery of bacteria than could be obtained orally, in order to compare the efficacies of L. monocytogenes dal dat and L. monocytogenes dal dat/pRRR. In the setting of natural infection, however, L. monocytogenes is an agent causing food-borne disease and is thought to spread to various tissues and the placenta from the gastrointestinal tract by hematogenous dissemination (3,51). Bypassing the gastrointestinal tract could lead to differences in dissemination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…immunization because we required a more precise delivery of bacteria than could be obtained orally, in order to compare the efficacies of L. monocytogenes dal dat and L. monocytogenes dal dat/pRRR. In the setting of natural infection, however, L. monocytogenes is an agent causing food-borne disease and is thought to spread to various tissues and the placenta from the gastrointestinal tract by hematogenous dissemination (3,51). Bypassing the gastrointestinal tract could lead to differences in dissemination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical syndromes include sepsis, central nervous system infections, endocarditis, gastroenteritis, and localized infections. Vertical transmission to the fetus often causes miscarriage or stillbirth in pregnant women (14,21,51). Since experimental infection is not a clinically ethical option, controlled trials have not allowed a drug of choice or duration of therapy to be established (40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar tests were performed for mucosal anti-IgG and IgA, except the secondary antibody to test for IgA was replaced with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-monkey IgA (Rockland Immunochemicals Inc., Gilbertsville, PA). To test for anti-Lm antibodies, an ELISA using either whole bacteria (Lm strain 12443) [42] or recombinant listeriolysin-O (LLO) as antigen was employed; Immulon 2 microtiter plates were coated with LLO at 0.1 μg/well. E. coliproduced recombinant 6X his-tagged LLO was purified from culture medium using a Ni-NTA column (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA) and tested for hemolytic activity as described [43].…”
Section: Elisa For Antibody Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in 178 cases of prenatal L. monocytogenes infection, 20% of pregnancies terminated in abortion or stillbirth, and 68% of live offspring were infected (9). This predisposition for fetal wastage and disseminated L. monocytogenes infection during pregnancy is not limited to only humans but widely reiterated across mammalian species, including nonhuman primates (10), ruminants (11,12), and rodents (13)(14)(15). Interestingly, our recent studies using mice bearing allogeneic pregnancies designed to recapitulate the natural heterogeneity between maternal MHC haplotype antigens and fetal MHC haplotype antigens indicate that prenatal L. monocytogenes infection-induced fetal resorption may not require direct in utero bacterial invasion (16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%