2013
DOI: 10.7465/jkdi.2013.24.6.1521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninformative priors for the scale parameter in the generalized Pareto distribution

Abstract: In this paper, we develop noninformative priors for the generalized Pareto distribution when the scale parameter is of interest. We developed the first order and the second order matching priors. We revealed that the second order matching prior does not exist. It turns out that the reference prior and Jeffrey's prior do not satisfy a first order matching criterion, and Jeffreys' prior, the reference prior and the matching prior are different. Some simulation study is performed and a real example is given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For prior specifications, we use non‐informative priors for both models. In particular, we use Jeffreys priors [see Kang () for details]. Thus, under model M 0 , the prior for ( α 0 , β 0 ) is π0()α0,β0β0prefix−11+α0prefix−11+2α0prefix−1true/2. Under model M 3 , assuming independent a priori , the joint prior for ( α 1 , α 2 , β 1 , β 2 ) is π3α1,α2,β1,β2β11()1+α11×()1+2α11/2β21()1+α21()1+2α21/2. Finally, we impose a discrete uniform prior on τ , which has been conventionally used in the literature of CP analysis (Yang, ).…”
Section: Bayesian Cp Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For prior specifications, we use non‐informative priors for both models. In particular, we use Jeffreys priors [see Kang () for details]. Thus, under model M 0 , the prior for ( α 0 , β 0 ) is π0()α0,β0β0prefix−11+α0prefix−11+2α0prefix−1true/2. Under model M 3 , assuming independent a priori , the joint prior for ( α 1 , α 2 , β 1 , β 2 ) is π3α1,α2,β1,β2β11()1+α11×()1+2α11/2β21()1+α21()1+2α21/2. Finally, we impose a discrete uniform prior on τ , which has been conventionally used in the literature of CP analysis (Yang, ).…”
Section: Bayesian Cp Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghosh and Mukerjee (1992), and Bernardo (1989,1992) give a general algorithm to derive a reference prior by splitting the parameters into several groups according to their order of inferential importance. This approach is very successful in various practical problems (Kang, 2013;Kang et al 2013Kang et al , 2014. Quite often reference priors satisfy the matching criterion described earlier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a Bayesian point of view, many authors have studied statistical inferences on Pareto distribution (e.g., Press, 1983, 1989;Geisser, 1984Geisser, , 1985Lwin, 1972;Nigm and Hamdy, 1987;Tiwari, Yang and Zalkikar, 1996;Ko and Kim, 1999;Fernández, 2008;Kim et al, 2009;Kang, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the family was originally applied to analyze socio-economic and natural phenomena with long tail, the family has potential for modeling reliability and lifetime data as well (Arnold and Press, 1983). The Pareto distribution has been used by many authors in a Bayesian viewpoint (e.g., Press, 1983, 1989;Geisser, 1984Geisser, , 1985Lwin, 1972;Nigm and Hamdy, 1987;Tiwari et al, 1996;Ko and Kim, 1999;Fernández, 2008;Kim et al, 2009;Kang, 2010). For the common scale parameter, Elfessi and Jin (1996) derived a class of improved estimators which uniformly dominates the MLE under a class of convex scale invariant loss functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%