2014
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.223198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Detection of a Balanced Fetal Translocation from Maternal Plasma

Abstract: BACKGROUND Massively parallel sequencing of circulating cell free (ccf) DNA from maternal plasma has been demonstrated to be a powerful method for the detection of fetal copy number variations (CNVs). Although the detection of CNVs has been described by multiple independent groups, genomic aberrations resulting in copy number–neutral events including balanced translocations have proven to be more challenging to detect noninvasively from ccf DNA. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequencing depth has been shown as the limiting factor in NIPT methods, with increased depth allowing improved detection of events in samples with lower fetal fractions or improved detection of smaller events. 9 High coverage sequencing has been used in multiple studies to unambiguously identify subchromosomal events 6,[10][11][12] and was used here as a reference for performance evaluation in discrepant amniocentesis samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequencing depth has been shown as the limiting factor in NIPT methods, with increased depth allowing improved detection of events in samples with lower fetal fractions or improved detection of smaller events. 9 High coverage sequencing has been used in multiple studies to unambiguously identify subchromosomal events 6,[10][11][12] and was used here as a reference for performance evaluation in discrepant amniocentesis samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one recent study, the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis for abnormal chromosome diseases by chromosome microarray technology and karyotyping was compared. In the prenatal diagnosis test, compared with karyotyping, microarray technology could identify the extra cell genetic information with clinical significance, nonparallel translocations, and aneuploidy; however, its disadvantage was that it could not identify parallel translocations and triploidy [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequencing depth has been shown as the limiting factor in NIPT methods, with increased depth allowing improved detection of events in samples with lower fetal fractions or improved detection of smaller events [9]. High coverage sequencing has been used in multiple studies to unambiguously identify sub-chromosomal events ([6,1012]) and was used here as a reference for performance evaluation in discrepant amniocentesis samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%