2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.09.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Diagnosis of Cardiac Allograft Rejection Using Echocardiography Indices of Systolic and Diastolic Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…, Bader et al . ). The tricuspid closure opening time (TCO) encompasses the isovolumic contraction time (IVCT), the ejection time (ET) and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) (Burghuber ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, Bader et al . ). The tricuspid closure opening time (TCO) encompasses the isovolumic contraction time (IVCT), the ejection time (ET) and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) (Burghuber ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1,2 The use of LVADs, either as bridge to transplantation or as destination therapy, has resulted in marked improvement of morbidity and mortality in these patients. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Better outcomes observed over the past decade can be attributed to greater experience of LVAD teams in the management of these devices, as well as to the introduction of newer second and third generation continuous-flow LVADs (CF-LVADs), which are smaller, more reliable, and durable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bader et al found that in patients with acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), LV fractional shortening was significantly reduced compared with those with no AMR (mean ± SD, 31.8 ± 8.9% vs. 36.0 ± 7.1%; p = 0.02). This study concluded, that although one echocardiographic parameter was statistically different in the setting of rejection, lack of consistency and overlap between nonrejection and rejection groups does not permit definitive noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection using this imaging modality [18].…”
Section: Non-doppler Speckle-tracking Derived 2d Strain Imagingmentioning
confidence: 86%