2019
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive diagnosis of urothelial cancer in urine using DNA hypermethylation signatures—Gender matters

Abstract: Urothelial cancer (UCa) is the most predominant cancer of the urinary tract and noninvasive diagnosis using hypermethylation signatures in urinary cells is promising. Here, we assess gender differences in a newly identified set of methylation biomarkers. UCa‐associated hypermethylated sites were identified in urine of a male screening cohort (n = 24) applying Infinium‐450K‐methylation arrays and verified in two separate mixed‐gender study groups (n = 617 in total) using mass spectrometry as an independent tech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
31
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
31
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, we applied a genome-wide, array-based screening to various urological tumor cell lines of urothelial, prostate and renal origin and compared the results to those obtained from the respective non-tumorous primary cells. To select targets of actual relevance for clinical UC detection, we further compared our in vitro results to those previously obtained in vivo from a genome-wide screening of a small set of urine samples from UC patients and controls [15]. Finally, candidate CpG-sites were evaluated in vivo in a larger set of urine specimens from UC patients, patients with prostate (PC) and renal cancer (RC), and non-cancer controls (population (PCt) and urological hospital controls (UCt)).…”
Section: Of 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For this purpose, we applied a genome-wide, array-based screening to various urological tumor cell lines of urothelial, prostate and renal origin and compared the results to those obtained from the respective non-tumorous primary cells. To select targets of actual relevance for clinical UC detection, we further compared our in vitro results to those previously obtained in vivo from a genome-wide screening of a small set of urine samples from UC patients and controls [15]. Finally, candidate CpG-sites were evaluated in vivo in a larger set of urine specimens from UC patients, patients with prostate (PC) and renal cancer (RC), and non-cancer controls (population (PCt) and urological hospital controls (UCt)).…”
Section: Of 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To check whether potentially bladder-specific sites identified in cell culture arrays were also differentially regulated between urine specimens from UC patients and controls and thus potentially suitable for the clinical practice, we compared the results from the cell culture screening with our previously published in vivo array results of a differential analysis derived from 12 urine samples from UC patients and 12 age, gender and smoking-status matched non-UC controls [15], GEO public depository: Accession GSE 120288).…”
Section: Comparison Of In Vitro and In Vivo Array Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations