2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive embryo evaluation and selection by time-lapse monitoring vs. conventional morphologic assessment in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a single-center randomized controlled study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LBR was reported in six studies. 22,24,30,32,39,40 The metaanalysis with a random effect model showed that embryo selection using TLM did not improve LBR compared with CMS (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.24; I 2 = 69%, low-quality evidence); see Figure 3a and Table S7.…”
Section: Results Of Meta-analysis In Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…LBR was reported in six studies. 22,24,30,32,39,40 The metaanalysis with a random effect model showed that embryo selection using TLM did not improve LBR compared with CMS (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.24; I 2 = 69%, low-quality evidence); see Figure 3a and Table S7.…”
Section: Results Of Meta-analysis In Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an important recently published randomized controlled trial (RCT) did not show any benefits of TLM in LBR 22 . In addition, other published RCTs provide new evidence for the practical value of the TLM system in embryo selection 23–25 . A timely summary of clinical evidence is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a couple of studies have reported that the evidence for significant advantages of TLMS remains unclear [110][111][112]. Elective single cleavage-stage embryo transfer with TLMS did not have any advantages over conventional observation in young women with good ovarian reserve [111].…”
Section: Clinical Outcomes Of Tlms and Secm Analysis In Human Ivf-et ...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, a couple of studies have reported that the evidence for significant advantages of TLMS remains unclear [110][111][112]. Elective single cleavage-stage embryo transfer with TLMS did not have any advantages over conventional observation in young women with good ovarian reserve [111]. That study also suggested that single blastocyst transfer with TLMS does not increase the likelihood of ongoing pregnancy compared to conventional observation; in particular, the use of a TLMS to choose blastocysts for fresh single embryo transfer on day 5 did not improve ongoing pregnancy rate compared to morphology alone [112].…”
Section: Clinical Outcomes Of Tlms and Secm Analysis In Human Ivf-et ...mentioning
confidence: 99%