1999
DOI: 10.1378/chest.116.1.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Estimation of Pulmonary Artery Diastolic Pressure in Patients With Tricuspid Regurgitation by Doppler Echocardiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, some studies have reported that the pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure correlates with PAP-SG (r = 0.92). 19) When comparing PAP measurements determined by TTE to those determined by S-G catheterization, values may vary by as much as 3 to 38 mmHg. 15,20,21) For example, in one study, TTE underestimated PAP by an average of 11 mmHg 15) and by more than 20 mmHg in 31% of patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, some studies have reported that the pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure correlates with PAP-SG (r = 0.92). 19) When comparing PAP measurements determined by TTE to those determined by S-G catheterization, values may vary by as much as 3 to 38 mmHg. 15,20,21) For example, in one study, TTE underestimated PAP by an average of 11 mmHg 15) and by more than 20 mmHg in 31% of patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, technical difficulties associated with pulmonary artery systolic pressure estimation in older subjects with more severe lung disease reduced the prognostic impact of this variable. Finally, intra-and inter-observer variability associated with pulmonary artery systolic pressure estimation using Doppler ultrasonography may have had an impact on the accuracy of this procedure, 18 and, although all measurements were performed by the same experienced echocardiographer, this may be considered a possible source of bias. Despite these limitations, the clinical relevance of the present findings should be highlighted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the validity of TRJV measurements was subject to early studies in the general population [12,13] as well as in various chronic medical conditions [14][15][16], fewer studies, and none specifically in SCD, have assessed their test-retest agreement or reproducibility [17][18][19]. On an individual level, our results have important implications for the routine use of TRJV measurements as a screening tool to estimate pulmonary artery systolic pressures and the reliance on a strict peak TRJV definition of 2.5 m/sec for determining treatment eligibility in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects with poor Doppler windows were excluded in Stephen et al's study, which demonstrated low inter-and intra-observer variability associated with using TRJV to estimate tricuspid valve gradient [17]. Also, results from studies of aortic and mitral valve regurgitation [20,21] cannot be extrapolated to TRJV measurements since the acoustic windows used for assessing flow across these valves rely on different transducer positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%