2013
DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.113.000297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Computed Tomography Angiography for Coronary Lesions of Intermediate Stenosis Severity

Abstract: Editorial see p 853 Clinical Perspective on p 889Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a lesion-specific technique to determine the functional importance of a coronary stenosis. [8][9][10][11][12] FFR is often used for determination of the physiological significance of coronary lesions of intermediate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
140
2
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
140
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of stenosis is dominant in moderate/severe stenosis. These findings suggest that computed tomography (CT)-FFR values in previous computational studies that neglected the influence of swirl flow from the aortic valve may be slightly overestimated in the case of mild stenosis [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. This overestimation of CT-FFR value may result in slightly lower sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The effect of stenosis is dominant in moderate/severe stenosis. These findings suggest that computed tomography (CT)-FFR values in previous computational studies that neglected the influence of swirl flow from the aortic valve may be slightly overestimated in the case of mild stenosis [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. This overestimation of CT-FFR value may result in slightly lower sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A subgroup analysis restricted to 150 vessels in 82 patients with intermediate stenoses of 30% to 69% revealed improved sensitivity (34%-72%) and NPV (78%-90%) compared with CTA. 33 There was no improvement in specificity (72%-67%) and the PPV, while improved, (27%-41%) was unacceptably low. The study did not achieve its prespecified primary outcome goal for the level of perpatient diagnostic accuracy of >70% of the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval.…”
Section: Computed Tomography-fractional Flow Reservementioning
confidence: 90%
“…As for TAG, one of the main parameters is attenuation through the coronary artery associated with morphology of the vessel lumen and other parameters. This proprietary method has been demonstrated to be somehow effective in providing the information about flow-limiting stenosis, [18][19][20] even though there are few studies and there is little information about the actual correspondence between FFRct-driven revascularization and outcomes, or medium/long-term longitudinal outcome studies.…”
Section: Morphological Ct-based Technique To Estimate Coronary Flow Amentioning
confidence: 99%