2017
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive iPhone Measurement of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using Intrinsic Frequency Methodology*

Abstract: Analysis of carotid waveforms using intrinsic frequency methods can be used to document left ventricular ejection fraction with accuracy comparable with that of MRI. The measurements require no training to perform or interpret, no calibration, and can be repeated at the bedside to generate almost continuous analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction without arterial cannulation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A one-way ANOVA comparison of ω 1 across the pediatric and adult cohorts demonstrated a significant difference (F = 7.3, Prob>F = 0.0001). Post-hoc analysis revealed a significant difference between the adult cohort (ω 1 = 99 +/-5 bpm) and both the 0-4 year old (ω 1 = 111 +/-2 bpm; p = 0.0006) and [15][16][17][18][19] year old (ω 1 = 105 +/-5 bpm; p = 0.02) cohorts ( Fig 4A). A one-way ANOVA comparison of ω 2 across all pediatric and adult cohorts showed a significant difference (F = 4.8, Prob>F = 0.003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A one-way ANOVA comparison of ω 1 across the pediatric and adult cohorts demonstrated a significant difference (F = 7.3, Prob>F = 0.0001). Post-hoc analysis revealed a significant difference between the adult cohort (ω 1 = 99 +/-5 bpm) and both the 0-4 year old (ω 1 = 111 +/-2 bpm; p = 0.0006) and [15][16][17][18][19] year old (ω 1 = 105 +/-5 bpm; p = 0.02) cohorts ( Fig 4A). A one-way ANOVA comparison of ω 2 across all pediatric and adult cohorts showed a significant difference (F = 4.8, Prob>F = 0.003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We also showed the difference between IFs values (ω 1 and ω 2 ) of pediatric population and of adults with structurally normal hearts and normal LV function. This is clinically significant since physiologically relevant measures such as LVEF can be approximated from ω 1 and ω 2 as shown by Pahlevan et al [17] and Armenian et al [18]). Given the wide range of body size in the pediatric population, the sensor head of the Vivio was modified to assess the ease-of-use and hand pressure required to capture non-invasive carotid artery waveforms in pediatric populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations