2017
DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis: on-treatment changes of serum markers predict the outcome of antifibrotic therapy

Abstract: Our observations suggest that a change in the serum marker ELF predicts changes in liver fibrosis over a longer period. These data support the use of ELF as a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis evolution in monitoring antifibrotic treatments, thus permitting 'response-guided' therapy by the early identification of patients who will benefit from prolonged treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although rapid reductions in APRI values, FIB-4 values, and LSMs obtained using ARFI may mainly result from improvement in hepatic necroinflammation rather than fibrosis regression, temporal changes in the noninvasive index can be a predictor of fibrosis regression in patients with CHC who receive Peg-IFN-based therapy. Tanwar et al demonstrated that a change in the enhanced liver fibrosis test (hyaluronic acid, terminal peptide of procollagen III, and tissue inhibitor of matrix metaloproteinase-1) from baseline to 12 months after Peg-IFN-based therapy initiation, in combination with baseline histologic staging, could predict histologic fibrosis regression at 24 months after the therapy [31]. Nonetheless, the results of the present study suggest that noninvasive index values obtained during or soon after DAA therapy may not be predictive of the concomitant fibrosis stage, and an additional histology-based correlative study is required to establish optimal cutoffs for predicting fibrosis stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although rapid reductions in APRI values, FIB-4 values, and LSMs obtained using ARFI may mainly result from improvement in hepatic necroinflammation rather than fibrosis regression, temporal changes in the noninvasive index can be a predictor of fibrosis regression in patients with CHC who receive Peg-IFN-based therapy. Tanwar et al demonstrated that a change in the enhanced liver fibrosis test (hyaluronic acid, terminal peptide of procollagen III, and tissue inhibitor of matrix metaloproteinase-1) from baseline to 12 months after Peg-IFN-based therapy initiation, in combination with baseline histologic staging, could predict histologic fibrosis regression at 24 months after the therapy [31]. Nonetheless, the results of the present study suggest that noninvasive index values obtained during or soon after DAA therapy may not be predictive of the concomitant fibrosis stage, and an additional histology-based correlative study is required to establish optimal cutoffs for predicting fibrosis stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collagen biomarkers may also be helpful to follow the efficiency of anti-fibrotic drugs. The N-terminal peptide of procollagen III associated with other ECM biomarkers, hyaluronic acid and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1, is a predictor of the outcome of anti-fibrotic therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C [360]. Markers of the ECM remodeling reflect the effect of anti-fibrotic therapy in a rat model of liver fibrosis induced by bile-duct ligation [359].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trials on steatohepatitis, cirrhosis and different kinds of hepatitis ( n = 18) included patient cohorts ranging from 14 to 200 participants, all of them aged >18 years. Patients were treated with silymarin orally or intravenously ( Pares et al, 1998 ; Tanamly et al, 2004 ; Ferenci et al, 2008 ; Hawke et al, 2010 ; Fried et al, 2012 ; Adeyemo et al, 2013 ; Fathalah et al, 2017 ; Tanwar et al, 2017 ) with dosages ranging from 280 to 2,100 mg/day or 5–20 mg/kg/day, respectively. Six studies compared the HM group to a placebo group ( Pares et al, 1998 ; Tanamly et al, 2004 ; Hawke et al, 2010 ; Fried et al, 2012 ; Adeyemo et al, 2013 ; Tanwar et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were treated with silymarin orally or intravenously ( Pares et al, 1998 ; Tanamly et al, 2004 ; Ferenci et al, 2008 ; Hawke et al, 2010 ; Fried et al, 2012 ; Adeyemo et al, 2013 ; Fathalah et al, 2017 ; Tanwar et al, 2017 ) with dosages ranging from 280 to 2,100 mg/day or 5–20 mg/kg/day, respectively. Six studies compared the HM group to a placebo group ( Pares et al, 1998 ; Tanamly et al, 2004 ; Hawke et al, 2010 ; Fried et al, 2012 ; Adeyemo et al, 2013 ; Tanwar et al, 2017 ). Silymarin did not reduce virus titers and/or serum alanine transaminase (ALT) in patients with Hepatitis C and non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis C, compared to placebo ( Adeyemo et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%