1990
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199007000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Monitoring of Human Cardiac Allograft Rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). These results are in agreement with those of Herzog et al [2] but not with those of Reader et al [8], and with previous studies reporting that monitoring of peripheral bloodidoes not give information about intragraft events during rejection…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). These results are in agreement with those of Herzog et al [2] but not with those of Reader et al [8], and with previous studies reporting that monitoring of peripheral bloodidoes not give information about intragraft events during rejection…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…[S] suggested the clinical value of limiting dilution analysis of PBL which is a sensitive and quantitative method for measuring the frequency of donor-reactive CTL. Reader et al [8] found in a few cases a relationship between donor CTLpf and the immunological status of the graft. In samples taken on the day of transplantation and those obtained between 3 months and 3 years after transplantation.…”
Section: No Difference Was'observed Between Donor-specific Ctlpf Of Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cCTL are not detectable using the present approach. Reader et al [25] suggested quantification of donor-reactive CTL in blood by means of LDA techniques as a useful tool for non-invasive rejection monitoring in cardiac transplants. An increase in the donor reactiveCTL frequency in the blood was associated with signs of rejection in the graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups studied the relation between the level of donor-speci®c CTLp in PBL and acute rejection [6±9]. Reader et al [9] claimed a signi®cant increase of CTLp frequencies during acute rejection (AR), although CTLp frequencies did not always correlate with histological rejection in the individual patient. The relation between stable engraftment and the frequency of alloreactive CTL and HTL is not very clear [10±16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%