2008
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810641105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy by massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA in maternal plasma

Abstract: Chromosomal aneuploidy is the major reason why couples opt for prenatal diagnosis. Current methods for definitive diagnosis rely on invasive procedures, such as chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis, and are associated with a risk of fetal miscarriage. Fetal DNA has been found in maternal plasma but exists as a minor fraction among a high background of maternal DNA. Hence, quantitative perturbations caused by an aneuploid chromosome in the fetal genome to the overall representation of sequences from that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
768
0
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 837 publications
(797 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
15
768
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 NIPT allows screening for these conditions with much greater specificity than traditional DS screening (DSS) 4 and thereby significantly reduces the need for invasive testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis) with the associated small miscarriage risk. 5 Following the first evidence in 2008 that NIPT for DS was feasible, 6,7 this test has moved swiftly into clinical practice with testing available in the private sector since 2011. Several USA and Hong Kong/China based companies now offer NIPT and have made their commercial tests widely available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 NIPT allows screening for these conditions with much greater specificity than traditional DS screening (DSS) 4 and thereby significantly reduces the need for invasive testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis) with the associated small miscarriage risk. 5 Following the first evidence in 2008 that NIPT for DS was feasible, 6,7 this test has moved swiftly into clinical practice with testing available in the private sector since 2011. Several USA and Hong Kong/China based companies now offer NIPT and have made their commercial tests widely available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Multi-gene diagnostic panels (Morgan et al 2010) • Achieving a molecular diagnosis for rare genetic diseases (Lupski et al 2010;Ng et al 2010a, b;Worthey et al 2011;Vissers et al 2010) • Tissue matching and HLA-typing (Bentley et al 2009;Gabriel et al 2009;Lind et al 2010) • Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (Chiu et al 2008;Fan et al 2008;Lo et al 2010) • Quantifying the burden of disease from solid tumours (Leary et al 2010;McBride et al 2010) and • Cancer genome profiling leading to stratified treatment regimens Diamandis et al 2010;Stratton et al 2009) RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing can also be used to study gene expression and for detection of somatic mutations, gene fusions, and other non-mutational events, an understanding of which can have an impact on management of diseases such as cancer (Cowin et al 2010;Robison 2010). However, numerous barriers to clinical translation still exist, including: validation of the technology; standardisation of the analysis pipeline; integration of information from the numerous databases of genomic variation; building a robust evidence base to allow clinical interpretation of novel variants; developing a service delivery infrastructure that can capitalise upon the high-throughput advantages of new sequencing technologies; providing an appropriately skilled health care workforce to deal with genomic medicine; and addressing the numerous ethical, legal and social implications of sequencing, storing and accessing whole genomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple approaches are available to determine if a fetus has abnormal chromosomes including karyotyping [12][13][14], genomic sequencing [15][16][17]; micro-array analysis [18] and PCR based methods [8]. The non-microscope techniques have the advantage of being rapid and cost effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%