2012
DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2012.674509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic disorders

Abstract: Management of pregnancies at risk of an X-linked Mendelian disorder has changed thanks to the noninvasive fetal sex assessment. As for other Mendelian disorders, until recently, their study was limited to those cases paternally inherited. Nevertheless, the new emerging technologies are also opening the scope to maternally inherited disorders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Health professionals may adopt different attitudes if they lack the skills to handle the emotional responses of patients who have received bad news. On the one hand, some carers believe that their responsibility is limited to addressing physical problems; in consequence, they will emphasise the development of skills related to the use of instruments developed in biomedicine, in order to provide a faster and more accurate diagnosis [1]. In monitoring the progress of a pregnancy control, such a carer's entire attention could be focused on confirming or ruling out the presence of biological problems in the foetus.…”
Section: Subcategory: Influence Of Technology Verbatimmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Health professionals may adopt different attitudes if they lack the skills to handle the emotional responses of patients who have received bad news. On the one hand, some carers believe that their responsibility is limited to addressing physical problems; in consequence, they will emphasise the development of skills related to the use of instruments developed in biomedicine, in order to provide a faster and more accurate diagnosis [1]. In monitoring the progress of a pregnancy control, such a carer's entire attention could be focused on confirming or ruling out the presence of biological problems in the foetus.…”
Section: Subcategory: Influence Of Technology Verbatimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biotechnology offers novel, highly reliable instruments and techniques for identifying maternal risk factors, enabling the early detection of congenital malformations or defects of diverse types related to foetal formation and development [1]. However, despite this considerable progress, there is often a profound lack of interest in interpersonal communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For disorders that are autosomal dominant with a known paternal mutation, NIPT is based on the detection or exclusion of the paternal mutation in the cf-DNA. This approach has been used in the diagnosis of Huntington’s disease [ 10 , 11 ]; myotonic dystrophy [ 12 ] and early onset primary dystonia I [ 13 ]. Two of these disorders are associated with trinucleotide repeat expansions that could be difficult to detect when parents share similar allele sizes or where the paternal allele is very large.…”
Section: Monogenic Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional diagnostic testing can then be limited to only those at-risk cases. This practical approach has been used for a broad range of X-linked disorders such as hemophilia and Duchene muscular dystrophy [ 11 ]. A serious concern with NIPT applied to sex assessment is its use for non-medical purposes.…”
Section: Monogenic Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the new emerging technologies are also opening the scope to maternally inherited disorders. 13 Since 1997, many studies have examined the accuracy of prenatal fetal sex determination using cffDNA, particularly for pregnancies at risk of an X-linked condition. To evaluate the use of cffDNA for prenatal determination (diagnosis) of fetal sex overall mean sensitivity was 96.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 95.2-97.7] and mean specificity was 98.9% (95% CI = 98.1-99.4).…”
Section: Historical Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%