Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-814189-2.00009-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Monogenic Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of fetus-derived cfDNA through a noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) has recently been clinically implemented for several monogenetic disorders [ 63 ]. Using a combination of NGS techniques, depending on the family history, we developed NIPD for retinoblastoma [ 39 ] that offers significant advantages over both newborn and invasive prenatal testing.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Retinoblastomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of fetus-derived cfDNA through a noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) has recently been clinically implemented for several monogenetic disorders [ 63 ]. Using a combination of NGS techniques, depending on the family history, we developed NIPD for retinoblastoma [ 39 ] that offers significant advantages over both newborn and invasive prenatal testing.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Retinoblastomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, test results of both WGS‐ and SNP‐based NIPTs were affected by factors not characterized in the testing sample. Moreover, quantitative measures were used to detect aneuploidies and pCNVs for both NIPT methods, which were greatly affected by outliers 6,8,27 . For our method, each sequencing read was either assigned to an allele or discarded, and then relative counts between different alleles were analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NIPT shows high sensitivity and specificity for common fetal aneuploidies, such as trisomies 21, 18, and 13, but low sensitivity and specificity for detecting subchromosomal deletions and duplications, 6 especially when the genomic aberrations are small 7 . For monogenic disorders (MDs), different noninvasive approaches have been developed, 8 but the application of such methods in clinical practice has lagged behind aneuploidy testing due to high costs and technical challenges. Due to different test philosophies, current NIPT approaches cannot be extended to detect monogenetic disorders in a cost‐effective manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The routine clinical diagnosis of thalassemia is to use invasive prenatal diagnostic techniques such as amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, or umbilical cord puncture to obtain fetal cells and perform thalassemia gene detection. It inevitably carries a risk of infection and a fetal loss rate of approximately 1% [21][22][23][24]. However, even in cases where both parents are carriers of the same recessive monogenic disorder, the probability that the child is homozygous is only one in four, meaning that 75 percent of diagnoses result in a healthy child or a carrier who does not require further treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%