2000
DOI: 10.1002/pen.11319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonisothermal two‐dimensional film casting of a viscous polymer

Abstract: A model is presented for simulating two‐dimensional, nonisothermal film casting of a viscous polymer. The model accommodates the effects of inertia and gravity, and allows the thickness of the film to vary across the width, but it excludes film sag and die swell. Based on the simulation results, three factors are shown to contribute to reducing neck‐in and promoting a uniform thickness: the self‐weight of the material, for low viscosity polymers; nonuniform thickness and/or velocity profiles at the die; and co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…provided the imposed non-uniformity is confined to the naturally occurring boundary layer. One can therefore conduct numerical experiments by solving the boundary-layer problem from § 3 with different preform thickness profiles imposed at x = 0 and discover the corresponding final thickness profiles produced at x = 1; an approach similar to this was adopted by Smith & Stolle (2000). Alternatively, one could impose the condition of a uniform final sheet thickness at x = 1 and then try to determine the required preform profile h(0, y).…”
Section: Non-rectangular Preformsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…provided the imposed non-uniformity is confined to the naturally occurring boundary layer. One can therefore conduct numerical experiments by solving the boundary-layer problem from § 3 with different preform thickness profiles imposed at x = 0 and discover the corresponding final thickness profiles produced at x = 1; an approach similar to this was adopted by Smith & Stolle (2000). Alternatively, one could impose the condition of a uniform final sheet thickness at x = 1 and then try to determine the required preform profile h(0, y).…”
Section: Non-rectangular Preformsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In § 5 we compare the predictions of our model with numerical solutions to the full three-dimensional problem and with experimental data. In § 6 we extend the Smith & Stolle (2000) idea of modifying the preform shape with the aim of producing a perfectly rectangular final cross-section, by presenting and illustrating a simple method for calculating the exact preform required. In § 7 we discuss the validity of our main assumptions (namely that heat flow is decoupled from fluid flow and that surface tension is not important) and the extension of the model to include a fully coupled temperature equation and surface-tension effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Co's group studied the draw resonance instability of various viscoelastic fluids using linear stability analysis on time and spatial variations of state variables [4,9]. However, the transient [15] successfully solved the nonisothermal 2-D governing equations with the finite element method (FEM), concluding that the neck-in phenomenon can be suppressed by the self-weight of the film, nonisothermal conditions, or nonuniform boundary conditions at the die exit. Satoh et al [16] also solved 2-D equations using Galerkin FEM with streamline elements for continuity and momentum equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The above three instability modes in film casting have been studied by many researchers, most notably by Agassant' and Co' groups, using (a) 1-D models to illustrate draw resonance phenomenon with the simplifying assumption of the constant film width [4,9];(b) other improved 1-D models that can predict both draw resonance phenomenon and the neck-in [6,[10][11][12][13], and (c) 2-D or 3-D models which can describe the edge beads as well as the above two instabilities [5,[14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%