2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2021.3099431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noniterative f -x-y Streaming Prediction Filtering for Random Noise Attenuation on Seismic Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, field seismic data are usually contaminated by noise (both random and coherent), which also causes FWI to deviate from the correct direction of convergence. Conventional denoising methods (e.g., f-x deconvolution, EMD, SVD, and wavelet transform) are usually based on theoretical model assumptions and rely on a priori information, which has difficulty handling complex noises and low computational efficiency (Han and Van, 2015;Liu and Zheng, 2022). Data-driven-based denoising methods can establish a strong non-linear mapping between noise-contained and pure data, which is currently a hot research topic in seismic denoising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, field seismic data are usually contaminated by noise (both random and coherent), which also causes FWI to deviate from the correct direction of convergence. Conventional denoising methods (e.g., f-x deconvolution, EMD, SVD, and wavelet transform) are usually based on theoretical model assumptions and rely on a priori information, which has difficulty handling complex noises and low computational efficiency (Han and Van, 2015;Liu and Zheng, 2022). Data-driven-based denoising methods can establish a strong non-linear mapping between noise-contained and pure data, which is currently a hot research topic in seismic denoising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%