1970
DOI: 10.1063/1.1674015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noniterative Solutions of Integral Equations for Scattering. IV. Preliminary Calculations for Coupled Open Channels and Coupled Eigenvalue Problems

Abstract: The homogeneous integral solution formalism developed by Sams and Kouri is illustrated for coupled open channel scattering calculations and coupled eigenvalue calculations. This method for scattering calculations compares favorably, both in accuracy and in computation time required, with the Lester-Bernstein close coupling solution of the differential equations for scattering and the Johnson-Secrest amplitude density method. Preliminary results for coupled eigenvalue integral equations are also encouraging. A … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model system contains a reasonable number of rotationally coupled states and will be seen to require a large number of grid points to obtain an accurate S-matrix element, so that it provides a good test of the viability of the approach. In addition, it has also been used previously to test several different approaches (Sams andKouri 1970, Johnson et a1 1967).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model system contains a reasonable number of rotationally coupled states and will be seen to require a large number of grid points to obtain an accurate S-matrix element, so that it provides a good test of the viability of the approach. In addition, it has also been used previously to test several different approaches (Sams andKouri 1970, Johnson et a1 1967).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few comparisons which have been made [1][2][3][4] usually involved only two or a few methods. Sometimes the calculations were done on different computers, and possibly worst of all, the tests were done on simple model problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%