“…As a result, the excitation is efficiently localized, together with degeneracy of the two orthogonally polarized degenerate excited states strongly removed because of structure disorder and solvation, 26 leading to the decreased anisotropy value in the high-energy ICT side as shown in Figure 3. 13,66 Regarding chromophore 5, conjugation among the triphenylamine core and three branches through CC do exist, but it is not as strong as that in chromophore 4 because of the small twisting barrier of the CC bond. 10,58 Therefore, in chromophore 5, for low-energy ICT states, triphenylamine core is more active, charge is partially distributed overall molecule, and the CDD distribution at each branch agrees with C 3h symmetry Frenkel exciton model expressions (see Table S2e states, triphenylamine core is not that active, charge redistribution is partially restricted, and the CDD distribution is slightly different from the expressions of an ideal C 3h symmetry Frenkel exciton model.…”