2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2008.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear aeroelastic response of slender wings based on Wagner function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first step (i.e., verification) can be carried out using the HPA wing characteristics, as described in Table 1, the approximating coefficients of the unsteady incompressible aerodynamics taken from Tables 3 and 4 at zero Mach number, and neglecting the nonlinearities due to inertia in Eq. (69); resulting in the same conditions adopted in [34]. Under these circumstances, the linear flutter speed and frequency, which can be obtained using the eigenvalue or the time response approach, are 32.6.9 m/s and 22.383 rad/ s, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first step (i.e., verification) can be carried out using the HPA wing characteristics, as described in Table 1, the approximating coefficients of the unsteady incompressible aerodynamics taken from Tables 3 and 4 at zero Mach number, and neglecting the nonlinearities due to inertia in Eq. (69); resulting in the same conditions adopted in [34]. Under these circumstances, the linear flutter speed and frequency, which can be obtained using the eigenvalue or the time response approach, are 32.6.9 m/s and 22.383 rad/ s, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To validate the developed aeroelastic equations, the linear and nonlinear aeroelastic behaviors of a HPA wing, including the flutter boundary, LCOs, and the time responses, are first compared with those from Shams et al [34] for the incompressible aerodynamic case. Changing the wing model and applying the unsteady aerodynamic loads for the compressible case, simply by substituting the wing specification, and coefficients of the indicial functions according to those given in Table 5, and Tables 3 and 4, respectively, the nonlinear aeroelastic behavior of a GW wing is then investigated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They showed that the HBM has good accuracy when forecasting amplitude and frequency of limit cycle oscillation. Shams et al [14] studied the aeroelastic response of slender isotropic wings using a second-order and third-order form of the Euler-Bernoulli beam model, respectively, and an unsteady linear aerodynamic model based on the Wagner function. Badiei et al [15] introduced a static stall model based on the Wagner function and investigated nonlinear aeroelastic behavior of slender wings with this model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haddadpour et al (2008) considered the effect of the offset between the reference axis and the mid-chord, fiber orientation and sweep angle on aeroelastic stability of composite box beam whose central point is noncoincident with the mid-chord of the profile of the wings. Further results regarding the structural behavior of thin-walled beams and aeroelastic instability of airfoils are addressed by Librescu and Song (2006), Shams et al (2008), Tang and Dowell (2004), Soltani et al (2004), Attorni et al (2011), Banichuk et al (2010 and Murua et al (2010). Zamani et al (2011) used variable stiffness laminate with curvilinear fiber to design thin walled beam for maximum failure load for the first time which result in more favorable stress distributions and improve the beam performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%