2019
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.4833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear control of three‐dimensional underactuated vehicles

Abstract: Summary This paper presents the derivation of robust trajectory‐tracking nonlinear control laws for general three‐dimensional vehicle models with one degree of underactuation where all of the state tracking errors are stabilized. The method is based on a novel transformation of the trajectory tracking problem into a reduced‐order error dynamics. Two traditional nonlinear controllers based on sliding mode and backstepping approaches are developed and shown to stabilize the trajectory tracking errors in presence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38,39 The most recent work that is applicable to more generic three-dimensional (3D) underactuated vehicle models addresses the path following problem rather than trajectory tracking. 40 This work builds on our previous works on 2D vehicles, 1 3D vehicles with one degree of underactuation, 2 and early research presented in Reference 41. Our previous work in Reference 2 had limited application since most available underactuated 3D vehicles have two degrees of underactuation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…38,39 The most recent work that is applicable to more generic three-dimensional (3D) underactuated vehicle models addresses the path following problem rather than trajectory tracking. 40 This work builds on our previous works on 2D vehicles, 1 3D vehicles with one degree of underactuation, 2 and early research presented in Reference 41. Our previous work in Reference 2 had limited application since most available underactuated 3D vehicles have two degrees of underactuation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the past decades, a host of remarkable control methods have been developed for trajectory tracking control of AUVs, such as backstepping control (BC), [7] adaptive control, [8][9][10] sliding mode control (SMC), [11][12][13] model predictive control (MPC), [14][15][16] fuzzy control, [17] neural networks control, [18] etc. Shen et al investigated the nonlinear model predictive control of AUVs, where a distributed implementation strategy was proposed to alleviate the computational burden by decomposing the original optimization problems into smaller size subproblems.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adts202100445mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decades, a host of remarkable control methods have been developed for trajectory tracking control of AUVs, such as backstepping control (BC), [ 7 ] adaptive control, [ 8–10 ] sliding mode control (SMC), [ 11–13 ] model predictive control (MPC), [ 14–16 ] fuzzy control, [ 17 ] neural networks control, [ 18 ] etc. Shen et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underactuated mechanical systems exist due to different reasons, [1][2][3] such as the failure of the actuator, the inherent dynamics of the system or just by the design; but a common challenge for control of the systems is the complicated coupling resulting from the underactuation. To deal with the underactuation problem, effective technique like the partial feedback linearization (PFL), 4 the backstepping, 5,6 the energy-based control methods such as the interconnection and damping assignment passivity-based control (IDA-PBC), 7,8 the controlled Lagrangian method (CL) 9,10 are proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%