1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.48.13784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear current-voltage characteristics of three-dimensional Josephson-junction arrays with anisotropic interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24,25 More recently, the appearance of BKT transition was also reported in bulk 3D high T c superconductors. [26][27][28][29] Below we show that in spite of the fact that our system is not the standard 2D context in which the BKT transition was usually considered, experimental data nevertheless show surprisingly good agreement with its various predictions.…”
Section: B Analogy With 2d Spin System and The Bkt Transitionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…24,25 More recently, the appearance of BKT transition was also reported in bulk 3D high T c superconductors. [26][27][28][29] Below we show that in spite of the fact that our system is not the standard 2D context in which the BKT transition was usually considered, experimental data nevertheless show surprisingly good agreement with its various predictions.…”
Section: B Analogy With 2d Spin System and The Bkt Transitionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…(Note that it is unclear whether any microscopic phase separation occurs in Tl 2-x Mo 6 Se 6 : this would both increase the size and decrease the number of the superconducting and metallic regions). Any nanoscale intergrowth of metallic and superconducting regions generates intrinsic arrays of Proximity junctions (PJ) or Josephson junctions (JJ) which will strongly influence the superconducting properties of such materials [14,15]. In the last three decades the behavior of such arrays has been studied in detail [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] as ideal model systems for real materials, mainly to gain a deeper insight into the nature of the phase transition from the normal into the superconducting state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any nanoscale intergrowth of metallic and superconducting regions generates intrinsic arrays of Proximity junctions (PJ) or Josephson junctions (JJ) which will strongly influence the superconducting properties of such materials [14,15]. In the last three decades the behavior of such arrays has been studied in detail [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] as ideal model systems for real materials, mainly to gain a deeper insight into the nature of the phase transition from the normal into the superconducting state. In these materials, the bulk superconducting properties are strongly influenced by fluctuations in the phase of the order parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pressurized (TMTSF) 2 PF 6 [13]. The highly anisotropic nature of such superconductors may imply the formation of intrinsic arrays of Josephson junctions (JJ) [14,15] within their crystalline structure. The global superconducting transition of arrays of JJs has been demonstrated to fall in the same universality class as the Berezinski-Kostelitz-Thouless (BKT) transition [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%