1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01050568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear development of a wave in a boundary layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also apparent that the harmonic has maximum near the wall and thus the nonlinearity is most pronounced there. This is in agreement with the experimental measurements of [3]. In figure 5 we reproduce a figure from [3] illustrating the experimental fluctuation level.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also apparent that the harmonic has maximum near the wall and thus the nonlinearity is most pronounced there. This is in agreement with the experimental measurements of [3]. In figure 5 we reproduce a figure from [3] illustrating the experimental fluctuation level.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the flow velocity in [3] is much less than the present computation. The value of Re_, can not be determined from the information presented in [3].…”
Section: Numerical Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Herbert's 1984 theory is based on Floquet theory and accounts for an experimentally observed three-dimensional 3-D instability. Although the governing equations are linearized and a local parallel-ow assumption is made, remarkable agreement i s obtained between predictions from Herbert's theory and experimental results, particularly for the peak-valley splitting mode identi ed by Klebano et al 1959Klebano et al , 1962 and for the peak-valley alignment mode observed by Kachanov et al 1977Kachanov et al , 1984. These modes are two distinct and di erent routes to transition that are discriminated based on the initial disturbance levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This is one of the distinct characteristic of K-type secondary instability (Kachanov, Kozlov & Levchenko 1977). It should be noted that these rollers are formed from the bottom wall up to y = 10.…”
Section: Nonlinear Growth and Turbulencementioning
confidence: 81%