2022
DOI: 10.3390/pr10050925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Dynamic Process Monitoring Based on Two-Step Dynamic Local Kernel Principal Component Analysis

Abstract: Nonlinearity may cause a model deviation problem, and hence, it is a challenging problem for process monitoring. To handle this issue, local kernel principal component analysis was proposed, and it achieved a satisfactory performance in static process monitoring. For a dynamic process, the expectation value of each variable changes over time, and hence, it cannot be replaced with a constant value. As such, the local data structure in the local kernel principal component analysis is wrong, which causes the mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lu et al developed two monitoring statistics based on the Wasserstein distance for fault detection [9]. The common methods are principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares (PLS), independent component analysis (ICA), canonical correlation analysis (CCA), statistical pattern analysis, and kernel based methods [10][11][12][13]. Yin et al compared the multivariate statistical methods for fault detection by using the Tennessee Eastman process (TEP) [14].…”
Section: Fault Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu et al developed two monitoring statistics based on the Wasserstein distance for fault detection [9]. The common methods are principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares (PLS), independent component analysis (ICA), canonical correlation analysis (CCA), statistical pattern analysis, and kernel based methods [10][11][12][13]. Yin et al compared the multivariate statistical methods for fault detection by using the Tennessee Eastman process (TEP) [14].…”
Section: Fault Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can understand the mathematical properties of specific kernel functions to explain the model's behavior [24]. Furthermore, the local kernel function [25] within specific local regions makes it more suitable for addressing local nonlinearity issues. The choice between kernel function and local kernel function depends on the data characteristics and the specific problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%