2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-018-4452-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear dynamics of a planar beam–spring system: analytical and numerical approaches

Abstract: The multiple timescales method is applied to the exact partial differential equations of the planar motion of a hinged-simply supported beam with a linear axial spring of arbitrary stiffness. The forceddamped and free oscillations of the system around frequencies corresponding to nth natural bending mode are examined thoroughly and compared with numerical simulations as well as with already published results obtained by Lindstedt-Poincaré method. A special numerical technique using explicit finite element meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to standard procedure based on Galerkin orthogonalisation method and modal reduction, we apply directly the multiple time scales method to partial differential equations and associated boundary conditions [21]. The proposed method has been applied in [14] to solve coupled transversal-longitudinal oscillations of fixed simply supported beam with a spring at the end. According to the multiple time scale method we introduce different time scales related to small parameter…”
Section: Perturbation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to standard procedure based on Galerkin orthogonalisation method and modal reduction, we apply directly the multiple time scales method to partial differential equations and associated boundary conditions [21]. The proposed method has been applied in [14] to solve coupled transversal-longitudinal oscillations of fixed simply supported beam with a spring at the end. According to the multiple time scale method we introduce different time scales related to small parameter…”
Section: Perturbation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed softening versus hardening dichotomy in the resonance curves and also strong interactions between flexural and longitudinal (axial) vibrations, leading to internal resonances occurring for specific stiffness of the axial spring. Those new results obtained for nonlinear beams (considered as fixed structures), the observed interactions between transversal and longitudinal vibrations and the dichotomy of the softening and hardening effect [14] motivated authors to equivalent studies of rotating structures. The nonlinear phenomena observed for the rotating inextensible beams [23,24] suggested to analyse a more general case of the extensional beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, numerical Finite Element (FE) simulations on clamped–clamped and hinged–hinged planar beams with homogeneous material properties show a hardening nature, while simply supported boundary conditions cause the softening of the frequency response for the first flexural mode [ 1 ]. This phenomenon has been investigated analytically and numerically in planar beams by means of axial–transversal coupling in nonlinear frequency amplitude response via implementing an additional axial spring [ 2 ], lumped tip mass [ 3 ], and higher-order resonances [ 4 ]. The predicted behaviors were numerically (FEM) and experimentally validated on a kinematically excited prototype with an additional mass moment of inertia caused by physical hinges [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by finite element method and then examined to understand and optimize the way it works, without building advanced laboratory test devices or sophisticated analytical algorithms. Moreover, such numerical analysis is available to cover predictable global phenomena in a wide range as well as unexpected local effects, see [1,2]. The main disadvantages of this approach is studying only specific cases and needing huge computational time for very complex systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%