2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.105113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear dynamics of Josephson vortices in merging superfluid rings

Abstract: We consider merger of two parallel toroidal atomic Bose-Einstein condensates with different vorticities in a three-dimensional (3D) trap. In the tunnel-coupling regime, Josephson vortices (rotational fluxons) emerge in the barrier between the superflows. When the barrier is gradually eliminated, we observe essentially three-dimensional evolution of quantum vortices, which may include the development of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the interface between the rings, in the framework of a weakly dissipative… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more populated component with m 1 = 2 imposes its angular momentum onto the final state, provided that the initial imbalance takes values above some critical value P cr . However, the values of P cr found in [30] for the (2, 0) set are different from those ±P cr for the set of the merging rings with (m 1 , m 2 ) = (+1, −1), given by Equation (19). These differences are not surprising, as the set of (+1, −1) features an obvious symmetry with respect to the two components.…”
Section: A Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking In a Stationary Hybrid Vortmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A more populated component with m 1 = 2 imposes its angular momentum onto the final state, provided that the initial imbalance takes values above some critical value P cr . However, the values of P cr found in [30] for the (2, 0) set are different from those ±P cr for the set of the merging rings with (m 1 , m 2 ) = (+1, −1), given by Equation (19). These differences are not surprising, as the set of (+1, −1) features an obvious symmetry with respect to the two components.…”
Section: A Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking In a Stationary Hybrid Vortmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Note that the merging rings with vorticities (2, 0), which we investigated in Ref. [30], also evolve into the final state with the total angular momentum m = 0 or m = 2, while the single-charged state, with m = 1, was not realized even when the angular momentum per particle of the initial state was L p = 1. A more populated component with m 1 = 2 imposes its angular momentum onto the final state, provided that the initial imbalance takes values above some critical value P cr .…”
Section: A Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking In a Stationary Hybrid Vortmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations