2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00780-020-00442-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear expectations of random sets

Abstract: Sublinear functionals of random variables are known as sublinear expectations; they are convex homogeneous functionals on infinite-dimensional linear spaces. We extend this concept for set-valued functionals defined on measurable set-valued functions (which form a nonlinear space) or, equivalently, on random closed sets. This calls for a separate study of sublinear and superlinear expectations, since a change of sign does not alter the direction of the inclusion in the set-valued setting.We identify the extrem… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, as studied in Xu [50], a natural candidate that extends (1.1) is a multidimensional BSDE which has the same form as (1.1), but with a vector-valued driver function g and a vector-valued terminal value X. However, the only vector-valued functions that can be seen as risk measures (i.e., monotone, translative, convex) are the trivial ones whose coordinates are risk measures on individual coordinate spaces; this was observed in Xu [50] in the dynamic setting via BSDE arguments and a more direct proof in the static setting was given recently in Molchanov and Mühlemann [43]. Hence, multidimensional BSDEs have very limited use for the representation of dynamic risk measures in the multivariate framework.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this case, as studied in Xu [50], a natural candidate that extends (1.1) is a multidimensional BSDE which has the same form as (1.1), but with a vector-valued driver function g and a vector-valued terminal value X. However, the only vector-valued functions that can be seen as risk measures (i.e., monotone, translative, convex) are the trivial ones whose coordinates are risk measures on individual coordinate spaces; this was observed in Xu [50] in the dynamic setting via BSDE arguments and a more direct proof in the static setting was given recently in Molchanov and Mühlemann [43]. Hence, multidimensional BSDEs have very limited use for the representation of dynamic risk measures in the multivariate framework.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is possible to construct a variant of the set E e (ξ) by applying the underlying sublinear expectation e to the positive part ( ξ, u ) + of the scalar product of ξ and u. The obtained function is the support function of a convex closed set, which may be considered a sublinear expectation of the segment [0, ξ], see [41] for a study of sublinear expectations with set-valued arguments.…”
Section: Is Continuous In Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This again confirms that Definition 3 (a1), (a2) (as well as (c1), (c2), (d1), (d2)) is perfectly consistent with and true generalizations of the scalar ones. One may compare [23]: the set-valued upper and lower expectations therein do not share most of these features. Remark 6.…”
Section: Further Correspondencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The definitions of E + , E − are essentially different from the ones in [23] and, in contrast to the latter, maintain many features of the scalar versions. For example, a relation such as E + (X) = −E − (−X) is not true for the concepts from [23];…”
Section: Remark 13 (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation