2006
DOI: 10.1021/ie060410h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Feedback Control of Surface Roughness Using a Stochastic PDE:  Design and Application to a Sputtering Process

Abstract: In this work, we develop a method for nonlinear feedback control of the roughness of a one-dimensional surface whose evolution is described by the stochastic Kuramoto−Sivashinsky equation (KSE), a fourth-order nonlinear stochastic partial differential equation. We initially formulate the stochastic KSE into a system of infinite nonlinear stochastic ordinary differential equations by using Galerkin's method. A finite-dimensional approximation of the stochastic KSE is then derived that captures the dominant mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, m should be equal or larger than the number of unstable modes of the process to ensure closed-loop stability. Furthermore, according to Theorem 1 in Lou and Christofides, 2006, m should be large enough to have a sufficiently small so that the closed-loop surface roughness of the infinitedimensional system is sufficiently close to the set-point value. However, a very large m should be avoided, since it requires a large number of actuators which may not be practical from a practical implementation point of view.…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, m should be equal or larger than the number of unstable modes of the process to ensure closed-loop stability. Furthermore, according to Theorem 1 in Lou and Christofides, 2006, m should be large enough to have a sufficiently small so that the closed-loop surface roughness of the infinitedimensional system is sufficiently close to the set-point value. However, a very large m should be avoided, since it requires a large number of actuators which may not be practical from a practical implementation point of view.…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, methods for state feedback control of surface roughness based on linear (Lou and Christofides, 2005a, b;Ni and Christofides, 2005b) and nonlinear (Lou and Christofides, 2006) stochastic PDE process models have been developed. The methods involve the reformulation of a stochastic PDE into a system of infinite linear/nonlinear stochastic ordinary differential equations (ODEs) by using modal decomposition, derivation of a finitedimensional approximation that captures the dominant mode contribution to the surface roughness, and state feedback controller design based on the finite-dimensional approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normalization procedure can be found in the the simulation part of the journal version of this paper [18]. This convenience is adopted to simplify our presentation.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, these detailed models can be employed to derive low-order models that are practical for model-based control techniques (Gallivan and Murray, 2004;Raimondeau and Vlachos, 2000;Varshney and Armaou, 2008). In specific deposition processes, closed-form process models describing surface morphology of thin films can be developed in the form of stochastic PDEs (Hu et al, 2008;Lou and Christofides, 2006;Zhang et al, 2010). The construction and validation of the stochastic PDE models are conducted through a set of snapshots obtained from the KMC simulations that cover the complete operating region (Ni and Christofides, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%