1995
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(95)00068-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete four-pile caps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis results in terms of load versus deflection, strain in the longtitudinal steel bars, and cracks were compared with the experimental results. It was found the finite element analysis results are in close agreement with the experimental results of RC pile caps (Sam and Iyer 1995). Souza et al 2007 conducted a non-linear finite element analysis of RC pile caps under generic loading.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The analysis results in terms of load versus deflection, strain in the longtitudinal steel bars, and cracks were compared with the experimental results. It was found the finite element analysis results are in close agreement with the experimental results of RC pile caps (Sam and Iyer 1995). Souza et al 2007 conducted a non-linear finite element analysis of RC pile caps under generic loading.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In order to verify if the adopted models for the numerical analysis of the two pile caps show correct behavior trend, comparative analysis of experimental tests and numerical simulations of several researchers. In this work, it will be presented the results of the comparative numerical analyses of the tests performed by Mautoni [15] and Adebar et al [16] and of the numerical simulation developed by Sam & Iyer [17]. In Delalibera [5], it can be observed the rest of the comparative analyses performed and more details of the numerical analyses developed.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the numerical simulation, these forces were 501,94 kN and 2589.74 kN. Figures [12], [13], [14], [15] e [16] showed the correlations obtained between the numerical and experimental results and [17]. The piles caps were simulated with arrangement reinforcement distributed in mesh and on the piles.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As conclusões de Iyer e Sam (1995) contrastam com as conclusões de Blévot e Frémy (1967) e de Taylor e Clarke (1976) no que diz respeito ao melhor arranjo de armadura. Nos resultados experimentais, a força média de ruína para os blocos com armadura em forma de malha e com armadura sobre as diagonais foram respectivamente 10% e 8% superior à obtida no bloco armado segundo os lados.…”
unclassified
“…Mas, percebe-se que o ângulo de inclinação das bielas dos modelos ensaiados por Iyer e Sam (1995) é de 54,2°, próximo ao valor máximo indicado por Blévot e Frémy (1967) de 55° para o uso do Método das Bielas com segurança. Considerando que o tirante idealizado situa-se sobre as estacas, pela lógica do Método das Bielas, é conveniente que haverá maior eficiência quando houver maior concentração de armaduras nessa região, todavia, ao se aumentar o ângulo de inclinação das bielas ocorre uma redução da força de tração no tirante que pode explicar os resultados obtidos por Iyer eSam (1995).…”
unclassified