2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear finite element study on the improvement of shear capacity in reinforced concrete T-Section beams by an alternative diagonal shear reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where σ is actual stress and σ( ) is nominal stress. e shear lag coefficient is related to the wide span ratio, support conditions, load form, cross-sectional shape and size, material properties, and location of the section [23][24][25]. In the final analysis, the shear lag is caused by uneven distribution of the longitudinal normal stress caused by internal force; its size and distribution are related to the internal force state; that is, the bending moment is related to the axial force.…”
Section: Distribution Of Shear Lag Effect During Construction Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where σ is actual stress and σ( ) is nominal stress. e shear lag coefficient is related to the wide span ratio, support conditions, load form, cross-sectional shape and size, material properties, and location of the section [23][24][25]. In the final analysis, the shear lag is caused by uneven distribution of the longitudinal normal stress caused by internal force; its size and distribution are related to the internal force state; that is, the bending moment is related to the axial force.…”
Section: Distribution Of Shear Lag Effect During Construction Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Concrete Damaged Plasticity inbuilt model is adopted, whereas for steel an "elastic-ideal plastic" model is used [7,[9][10][11][12]. The CDP model based on the material properties is listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose is to achieve the best correlation with the laboratory tests results. Also, analysis is performed to find parameters of the key impact on response and their value ranges which can be used in further investigations [7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although joints have a restricted area, they are strongly involved in the transfer of forces, mostly under earthquakes. In particular, they often present low shear strength in the joints, leading to brittle shear failures [1,2]. An inadequate design can lead to a shear failure of beam-column joints and to a consequent collapse of the structure [3], particularly in the case of earthquakes [4][5][6][7], even if they are expected to be safe according to classical seismic evaluations that column shear, the tensile forces of longitudinal bars that cross the joint panel are named F1, F2, F7, and F8, and the compressive forces (assumed as acting at the position of the bars) are named F3, F4, F5, and F6, while the F9, F10 are the resultant force carried by stirrups and/or eventual external reinforcement, and C is the concrete compressive resultants on half of the diagonal (i.e., 0.5H b /sin ϑ) of the joint panel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%