2013
DOI: 10.1121/1.4812865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear focal shift beyond the geometrical focus in moderately focused acoustic beams

Abstract: The phenomenon of the displacement of the position along the axis of the pressure, intensity, and radiation force maxima of focused acoustic beams under increasing driving voltages (nonlinear focal shift) is studied for the case of a moderately focused beam. The theoretical and experimental results show the existence of this shift along the axis when the initial pressure in the transducer increases until the acoustic field reaches the fully developed nonlinear regime of propagation. Experimental data show that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement between experiments and simulations in the quasi-linear region (low and medium input voltages) is good, but they differ slightly at high power levels (nonlinear regime), being the maximum pressure nonlinear focal shift effect slightly higher in the simulation. A similar discrepancy was also detected in Camarena et al 11 and explained according to several reasons: first, the frequency response of the hydrophone is bounded to 20 MHz, which limits the number of harmonics detected by the hydrophone. Second, the sound field does not present a flat and uniform distribution over the active area of the receptor (200 µm active diameter), thus the measure is underestimated after the spatial averaging of the measurement region, which does not happen in the simulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The agreement between experiments and simulations in the quasi-linear region (low and medium input voltages) is good, but they differ slightly at high power levels (nonlinear regime), being the maximum pressure nonlinear focal shift effect slightly higher in the simulation. A similar discrepancy was also detected in Camarena et al 11 and explained according to several reasons: first, the frequency response of the hydrophone is bounded to 20 MHz, which limits the number of harmonics detected by the hydrophone. Second, the sound field does not present a flat and uniform distribution over the active area of the receptor (200 µm active diameter), thus the measure is underestimated after the spatial averaging of the measurement region, which does not happen in the simulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…They also provided an interpretation of the phenomenon based on the self-defocusing effect due to the asymmetrical distortion of the wave profile and to the increase in propagation velocity of the compressive phase of the wave close to the beam axis. Recently, Camarena et al 11 proved experimentally that at high amplitudes and for moderately focusing (G = 18.8) the position of the on-axis pressure maximum and radiation force maximum can surpass the geometrical focal length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, shifts between the predicted and observed focal regions have been frequently reported in HIFU-related studies. Usually, the shift was measured to be around 1-3 mm for 1-MHz HIFU transducers [24], 4-5 mm for~2.2-MHz excitation [51], and an empirical formula was also used to calculate the focus shift [22]. Although different possible mechanisms have been proposed and a series of correlation studies have been carried out [21][22][23][24][25][26][27], detailed theoretical proof that could quantitatively explain the inherent mechanisms of the observed focal shifts is still lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the focal displaces towards the source. Both effects can be related to nonlinear self-refraction of the beam in the focal spot (Camarena et al, 2013a). However, due to the low focal size of this strongly focused device (Camarena et al, 2010) these effects are minor and the total displacements are not longer that λ/4.…”
Section: High Intensity Regimementioning
confidence: 97%
“…(Camarena et al, 2013b). Thus, the heating pattern will be different using directly Q v = 2αI, or by estimating the energy deposition rate using the momentum transfer, i.e.…”
Section: Nonlinear Tissue Heating Ratementioning
confidence: 99%