2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear influence of winter meteorology and precursor on PM2.5 based on mathematical and numerical models: A COVID-19 and Winter Olympics case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shifts in the feature importance of O 3 and NO 2 from Pre-WO to WO result from regulation of anthropogenic emissions. During the WO period, the reduction of anthropogenic emissions resulted in a decline in NO x levels and probably caused an elevation in O 3 concentrations due to reduced O 3 consumption by NO. , Overall, the results obtained from machine learning (Figure S8a) demonstrated that the low O 3 levels, moderate NO 2 concentrations, and high NO levels continuously limited the formation of the NO 3 radical during Pre-WO. On the other hand, the steady-state analysis complemented machine learning to address the N 2 O 5 uptake (Table S2 and Figure S5a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The shifts in the feature importance of O 3 and NO 2 from Pre-WO to WO result from regulation of anthropogenic emissions. During the WO period, the reduction of anthropogenic emissions resulted in a decline in NO x levels and probably caused an elevation in O 3 concentrations due to reduced O 3 consumption by NO. , Overall, the results obtained from machine learning (Figure S8a) demonstrated that the low O 3 levels, moderate NO 2 concentrations, and high NO levels continuously limited the formation of the NO 3 radical during Pre-WO. On the other hand, the steady-state analysis complemented machine learning to address the N 2 O 5 uptake (Table S2 and Figure S5a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, compared to the periods BWO and DWP, the temperature and RH in Beijing during the Olympics decreased by 10.4–20.4%, and the mainly northerly average wind speed increased by ~21.7%. The favorable meteorological conditions dispersed pollutants and diluted those with lower concentrations, which ensured good air quality DWO [ 20 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the restrictive policy seems to have gradually changed public opinion such that the private use of fireworks has declined, resulting in lower particulate concentrations after 2018 [22]. The year 2022 revealed extremely low concentrations, as a result of not only increasing restrictions but also efforts aiming for clearer air related to preparations for the winter games that ran 4 February 2022/20 February [47,48]. There was much concern about air pollution and the interface of the games with the period of New Year celebrations [47] while COVID-19 imposed restrictions that also reduced the air pollution concentrations [48].…”
Section: Air Pollution From Fireworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The year 2022 revealed extremely low concentrations, as a result of not only increasing restrictions but also efforts aiming for clearer air related to preparations for the winter games that ran 4 February 2022/20 February [47,48]. There was much concern about air pollution and the interface of the games with the period of New Year celebrations [47] while COVID-19 imposed restrictions that also reduced the air pollution concentrations [48]. There were expectations of blue skies for the Winter Olympics; a concept termed "Beijing Blue" [48] has emerged to describe improved pollution during important events ever since the Olympic Games of 2008 and the APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) meeting of 2015 [49].…”
Section: Air Pollution From Fireworkmentioning
confidence: 99%