2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear mixed effect modelling for improved estimation of water retention and infiltration parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dourado-Neto et al, 2000). The isolated treatment-specific model fitting has three main disadvantages: (i) comparison of SWRC between treatments via formal statistical tests is not possible due to the absence of an error structure that accounts for overall variance within treatments; (ii) autocorrelations among random errors of moisture measurements taken in the same sample unit (the cylinder) under different matric potentials are ignored, leading to incorrect quantification of model uncertainty; and (iii) the spatial variability, likely to be high under field conditions, cannot be fully accounted for (Omuto et al, 2006). In this study we propose the use of a nonlinear mixed (NLM) model to overcome these disadvantages.…”
Section: T De Melo Carvalho Et Al: Biochar Increases Plant-availmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dourado-Neto et al, 2000). The isolated treatment-specific model fitting has three main disadvantages: (i) comparison of SWRC between treatments via formal statistical tests is not possible due to the absence of an error structure that accounts for overall variance within treatments; (ii) autocorrelations among random errors of moisture measurements taken in the same sample unit (the cylinder) under different matric potentials are ignored, leading to incorrect quantification of model uncertainty; and (iii) the spatial variability, likely to be high under field conditions, cannot be fully accounted for (Omuto et al, 2006). In this study we propose the use of a nonlinear mixed (NLM) model to overcome these disadvantages.…”
Section: T De Melo Carvalho Et Al: Biochar Increases Plant-availmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adopting such an approach, the quantification of uncertainty of shape parameters α and n and the test of the null hypothesis of interest were performed considering the overall variance of soil moisture arising from within treatments variance. Further, the NLM model permits accounting for potential random effects associated with plot location, as proposed by Omuto et al (2006). In our study, correlations among measurements taken within the same sample unit (one cylinder per plot for each soil depth) were accounted for by including plot as a random effect u in the model.…”
Section: Measurements On Soil Wrc and The Modelling Of Swrcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance of the biexponential model in relating to soil physical conditions was also tested using data from Omuto et al (2006). This dataset contains WRC for topsoil samples from physically degraded and non-degraded sites in the Upper Athi river basin in eastern Kenya.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WRC model testing on measured data was achieved through the use of nonlinear mixed effects (NLME) approach (Omuto et al, 2006). According to this approach, estimation of WRC model parameters is split into two stages: stage one that involves estimation of average model parameters from the entire datasets and stage two that involves estimation of individual sample parameters as random deviations around average estimates.…”
Section: Nonlinear Mixed-effects Approach For Model Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation