2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear mixed modeling of basal area growth for shortleaf pine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to composite models, a few studies (Hahn and Leary, 1979;Holdaway 1984;Murphy and Shelton, 1996;Lynch et al, 1999;Lessard et al, 2001;Budhathoki et al, 2008) have used the potential or average growth-based approach, which predicts either maximum potential or average growth modified by exponentials of site and individual tree competition-related variables. Among these models, an average growth-based diameter growth model developed by Lessard et al (2001) (Eq.…”
Section: Diameter Growth Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to composite models, a few studies (Hahn and Leary, 1979;Holdaway 1984;Murphy and Shelton, 1996;Lynch et al, 1999;Lessard et al, 2001;Budhathoki et al, 2008) have used the potential or average growth-based approach, which predicts either maximum potential or average growth modified by exponentials of site and individual tree competition-related variables. Among these models, an average growth-based diameter growth model developed by Lessard et al (2001) (Eq.…”
Section: Diameter Growth Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies (Murphy and Shelton, 1996;Lynch et al, 1999;Budhathoki et al, 2008), potential growth has been modeled using more flexible growth functions, such as Chapman-Richards or logistic, and the parameters of both potential growth and modifier functions are estimated simultaneously. Rather than using potential growth, another approach for modeling diameter growth is to apply an average growth function (Lessard et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the random component takes into Adamec account the heterogeneity and randomness in the data caused by known and unknown factors (Vonesh & Chiinchilli 1997). Mixed models thus provide a better parameter estimates than OLS regressions (Budhathoki et al 2008), providing a flexible tool to analyze a given area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a calibration with fixed and random effects (also referred to as "calibrated conditional prediction"), which applies to individual areas. These calibration techniques have a wide range of applications, though so far they have been most frequently used in modeling growth (Miguel et al 2013), increment (Calama & Montero 2005, Budhathoki et al 2008, Aakala et al 2013 and height-diameter functions (Trincado et al 2007, Adame et al 2008, Schmidt et al 2011, Castaño-Santamaría et al 2013, Lu & Zhang 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dentre essas técnicas é possível citar o uso de modelos de regressão não lineares, generalizados e generalizados de efeito misto. Trabalhos no meio florestal que envolvem tais aplicações estão sendo empregados recentemente e foram estudados por Budhathoki et al (2008), Calegario et al (2005a,b), Fang e Bailey (2001), Gregoire et al (1995) e Pilar-Díaz e Couto (1999). Outra Carvalho, S. de P. C. e et al…”
Section: Introductionunclassified